Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40751246›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular diabetology2025

Metabolomic profiling reveals interindividual metabolic variability and its association with cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome risk.

Meng Zhou, Wenxiu Sun, Yuhan Gao, Bei Jiang, Tianwei Sun, Rui Xu, Xiujuan Zhang, Qian Wang, Qiuhui Xuan, Shizhan Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Meng ZhouKey Laboratory of Endocrine Glucose and Lipids Metabolism and Brain Aging, Ministry of Education, Department of Endocrinology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Wenxiu SunDepartment of Nursing, Taishan Vocational College of Nursing, Taian, China.
Yuhan GaoKey Laboratory of Endocrine Glucose and Lipids Metabolism and Brain Aging, Ministry of Education, Department of Endocrinology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Bei JiangKey Laboratory of Endocrine Glucose and Lipids Metabolism and Brain Aging, Ministry of Education, Department of Endocrinology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Tianwei SunKey Laboratory of Endocrine Glucose and Lipids Metabolism and Brain Aging, Ministry of Education, Department of Endocrinology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Rui XuKey Laboratory of Endocrine Glucose and Lipids Metabolism and Brain Aging, Ministry of Education, Department of Endocrinology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Xiujuan ZhangHealth Management Center, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China. daixi421@163.com.
Qian WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China. wangqian122411@126.com.
Qiuhui XuanKey Laboratory of Endocrine Glucose and Lipids Metabolism and Brain Aging, Ministry of Education, Department of Endocrinology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China. xuanflytosky@163.com.
Shizhan MaKey Laboratory of Endocrine Glucose and Lipids Metabolism and Brain Aging, Ministry of Education, Department of Endocrinology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China. msz2010lw@163.com.

Funding

National Metabolomics Data Repository - nextgen Metabolomics WorkbenchU2CDK119886 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SUBRAMANIAM, SHANKAR · 2018 to 2021
$12.7M
Biomedical Data Commons Workbench (BDCW)OT2OD030544 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SUBRAMANIAM, SHANKAR · 2020 to 2024
$3.2M
Web Portal CoreU2CDK119889 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CONLON, MICHAEL, GARRETT, TIMOTHY J · 2018 to 2021
$1.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS U2C DK119886NIDDK NIH HHS U2C DK119889NIH HHS OT2 OD030544Qian Wang National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant NO. 82300880)Qiuhui Xuan National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant NO. 22204090)Shizhan Ma National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant NO. 82370788)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveCardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) syndrome reflects the interrelated pathophysiology of obesity, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease. Conventional CKM staging often detects risk only after substantial organ dysfunction and may overlook early metabolic heterogeneity. This study aimed to employ plasma metabolomics to identify metabolic subtypes linked to CKM severity and explore early biomarkers for high-risk individuals.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted involving 163 adults, which included 86 individuals clinically staged as CKM 0-3 according to the criteria proposed by the American Heart Association (AHA). Plasma samples underwent untargeted metabolomic and lipidomic profiling using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Unsupervised clustering identified metabolic subtypes, with validation via random forest analysis. Group differences were assessed using orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) and logistic regression classifiers.

resultsA total of 390 metabolites, categorized into 9 superclasses and 30 subclasses, were identified. Three distinct metabolic clusters emerged: Cluster 1 (glycerophospholipid-enriched), Cluster 2 (fatty acyl-dominant), and Cluster 3 (glycolipid-enriched). At the individual differential metabolite level, Cluster 1 exhibited a generally low metabolic status, Cluster 2 demonstrated an intermediate metabolic profile, and Cluster 3 showed a high metabolic status. High-risk CKM individuals were predominantly assigned to Cluster 3 (p < 0.001). Within each cluster, OPLS-DA effectively differentiated high- and low-risk individuals based on lipid profiles, highlighting triglycerides, fatty acids, phosphatidylcholines, sphingolipids, and acylcarnitines as key discriminators. Secondary clustering among stage 3 of CKM patients revealed substantial metabolic heterogeneity. A panel of 20 metabolites achieved high diagnostic performance for stage 3 of CKM individual (AUC = 0.875).

conclusionsUntargeted plasma metabolomic profiling reveals distinct metabolic subtypes corresponding to CKM severity and uncovers marked heterogeneity within the high-risk group. Key metabolite signatures may enhance early risk stratification and support more personalized management strategies beyond conventional CKM staging.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesKidney DiseasesMetabolic SyndromeMetabolomeMetabolomicsAdultAgedBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLipidomicsMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisBiomarkersCardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndromeLipidomicsLiquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS)Metabolic endotypesMetabolomicsUnsupervised clustering

Identifiers

PMID40751246
PMCPMC12317516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.