ArticleBMC surgery2025
Translating high-precision mixed reality navigation from lab to operating room: design and clinical evaluation.
Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- PF-CMNet: Progressive Frequency-Aware Cross-Modal Network with Missing-Modality Distillation for 3D Brain Tumor Segmentation.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Head and Neck Surgical Oncology: A State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Comprehensive protocol for mixed reality visualization and navigation using 3D Slicer.PloS one · 2026Article
- Preliminary evaluation of mixed reality navigation with single-vertebra registration in spinal surgery.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- NP-guide: a portable projection-based navigation system for neurosurgery and beyond.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and evaluate a Mixed Reality Navigation (MRN) system for neurosurgical navigation, ensuring its feasibility for preoperative planning and real-time intraoperative guidance.
methodsThe MRN system integrates a head-mounted display (HMD) with active infrared tracking and a stabilization approach. It was validated in a laboratory setting using simulation models and assessed in a prospective clinical study involving 46 patients with intracranial lesions. Multimodal imaging-based holograms were overlaid onto the patient's head for augmented visualization. Target localization accuracy was compared between MRN and Traditional Optical Navigation (TON) using Euclidean distance measurements.
resultsIn laboratory evaluations, the MRN system demonstrated consistent and reliable performance. The fiducial registration error (FRE), which reflects the alignment accuracy between corresponding anatomical fiducial points on the physical and virtual models, ranged from 1.70 to 2.20 mm. While the target registration error (TRE)-reflecting the final localization accuracy-ranged from 1.30 to 1.70 mm. Clinical validation confirmed the system's efficiency, with comparable navigation durations between MRN (6.36 ± 1.27 min) and TON (6.23 ± 1.30 min, P = 0.41). The preoperative localization error was 2.14 ± 1.23 mm, which increased to 3.65 ± 1.49 mm under simulated intraoperative conditions (P < 0.05), highlighting the potential influence of intraoperative factors on accuracy.
conclusionWith its low hardware cost, MRN system demonstrates precision comparable to TON, while offering enhanced 3D visualization and multi-tool tracking capabilities. These features suggest that mixed reality technology provides a promising new direction for the development of next-generation neurosurgical navigation systems, as supported by both laboratory and clinical results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.