Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40751242›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2025

Translating high-precision mixed reality navigation from lab to operating room: design and clinical evaluation.

Zhongjie Shi, Yilong Peng, Xin Gao, Sifang Chen, Gang Chen, Gaojian Pan, Zhirong Liang, Zhanxiang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhongjie ShiDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, No.55 Zhenhai Road, Siming District, Xiamen, Fujian, 361001, China.
Yilong PengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, 529000, China.
Xin GaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, No.55 Zhenhai Road, Siming District, Xiamen, Fujian, 361001, China.
Sifang ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, No.55 Zhenhai Road, Siming District, Xiamen, Fujian, 361001, China.
Gang ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Zhuhai People's Hospital, Zhuhai, 519000, China.
Gaojian PanDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, No.55 Zhenhai Road, Siming District, Xiamen, Fujian, 361001, China.
Zhirong LiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Panyu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Zhanxiang WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, No.55 Zhenhai Road, Siming District, Xiamen, Fujian, 361001, China. wzxcn@foxmail.com.

Funding

Clinical Research Fund Project Initiated by Investigators from the First Affiliated Hospi-tal of Xiamen University XMFHIIT-2023SL066National Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province 2022J011355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop and evaluate a Mixed Reality Navigation (MRN) system for neurosurgical navigation, ensuring its feasibility for preoperative planning and real-time intraoperative guidance.

methodsThe MRN system integrates a head-mounted display (HMD) with active infrared tracking and a stabilization approach. It was validated in a laboratory setting using simulation models and assessed in a prospective clinical study involving 46 patients with intracranial lesions. Multimodal imaging-based holograms were overlaid onto the patient's head for augmented visualization. Target localization accuracy was compared between MRN and Traditional Optical Navigation (TON) using Euclidean distance measurements.

resultsIn laboratory evaluations, the MRN system demonstrated consistent and reliable performance. The fiducial registration error (FRE), which reflects the alignment accuracy between corresponding anatomical fiducial points on the physical and virtual models, ranged from 1.70 to 2.20 mm. While the target registration error (TRE)-reflecting the final localization accuracy-ranged from 1.30 to 1.70 mm. Clinical validation confirmed the system's efficiency, with comparable navigation durations between MRN (6.36 ± 1.27 min) and TON (6.23 ± 1.30 min, P = 0.41). The preoperative localization error was 2.14 ± 1.23 mm, which increased to 3.65 ± 1.49 mm under simulated intraoperative conditions (P < 0.05), highlighting the potential influence of intraoperative factors on accuracy.

conclusionWith its low hardware cost, MRN system demonstrates precision comparable to TON, while offering enhanced 3D visualization and multi-tool tracking capabilities. These features suggest that mixed reality technology provides a promising new direction for the development of next-generation neurosurgical navigation systems, as supported by both laboratory and clinical results.

Indexed as

Augmented RealityBrain NeoplasmsNeuronavigationNeurosurgical ProceduresSurgery, Computer-AssistedAdultAgedEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperating RoomsProspective StudiesFiducial registrationMixed reality navigationNeurosurgeryTarget registration

Identifiers

PMID40751242
PMCPMC12315425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.