Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40751232›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

The role of work location in associations between need satisfaction and well-being at work: a daily diary design among Dutch office workers.

Roy Peijen, Irene M W Niks, Marianne H J van Zwieten, Karen M Oude Hengel, Noortje Wiezer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Roy PeijenUnit Health and Work, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Sylviusweg 71, Leiden, 2333 BE, The Netherlands. roy.peijen@tno.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5556-3340
Irene M W NiksUnit Health and Work, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Sylviusweg 71, Leiden, 2333 BE, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6502-0887
Marianne H J van ZwietenUnit Defence, Safety and Security, Netherlands Organization of Applied Scientific Research(TNO), Kampweg 5, Soesterberg, 3769 ZG, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2789-4820
Karen M Oude HengelUnit Health and Work, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Sylviusweg 71, Leiden, 2333 BE, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3745-2660
Noortje WiezerUnit Health and Work, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Sylviusweg 71, Leiden, 2333 BE, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4898-4040

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter a quick rise of remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic, hybrid working (i.e., combining remote and on-site work locations) is becoming common post-pandemic. This study aimed to investigate to what extent daily work location (i.e., office, home, or hybrid - a combination within the same day) affects daily associations between psychological need satisfaction (i.e., relatedness satisfaction and autonomy satisfaction) and well-being of office workers (i.e., perceived stress and work pleasure).

methodsA daily diary study design with ecological momentary assessments (EMA) was used to investigate day-level relations between work location, need satisfaction, and employee well-being outcomes among 201 Dutch office workers. Measurements took place at the end of each working day (Mondays through Fridays) every month’s first week for three consecutive months. In total, we collected 1,448 daily observations of 201 employees. Multilevel regression models were performed to examine the relationship between daily need satisfaction of relatedness and autonomy, and their association with both daily work pleasure and daily work stress. Additionally, we explored whether work location serves as a moderator in these relationships.

resultsEmployees reported higher relatedness satisfaction but less autonomy satisfaction on office or hybrid working days compared to home working days. Higher daily levels of relatedness and autonomy satisfaction were associated with increased work pleasure and reduced work stress. On office days, the positive relationship between relatedness satisfaction and work pleasure and the negative relationship between relatedness satisfaction and work stress were more pronounced than on home working days. In contrast, the positive relationship between autonomy satisfaction and work pleasure as well as its negative relationship with stress were consistent across work locations, showing no variation between office, home or combined settings.

conclusionsThis study shows that daily work location may be an important factor to consider in the context of (enhancing) daily need satisfaction and daily employee well-being. Different work locations can contribute to daily need satisfaction and employee well-being in different ways. It seems particularly important that working in the office is organized in a way that employees are able to make meaningful connections with others.

Indexed as

COVID-19Job SatisfactionPersonal SatisfactionWorkplaceAdultDiaries as TopicEcological Momentary AssessmentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPsychological Well-BeingWorking ConditionsAutonomyDiary studyHybrid workingNeed satisfactionRelatednessWork pleasureWork stress

Identifiers

PMID40751232
PMCPMC12315201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.