ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2025
Pilot testing a novel remotely delivered intensive outpatient program for hospitalized patients with opioid use disorder.
Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Peer-Led, Narrative-Based, and Mobile-Supported Intervention in Opioid Use Disorder: Multiphase Qualitative and Longitudinal Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Observational
- Correction: Pilot testing a novel remotely delivered intensive outpatient program for hospitalized patients with opioid use disorder.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIndividuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) are frequently hospitalized for injection-related medical complications, yet they often receive inadequate treatment for the OUD itself. We previously conducted a qualitative study to adapt an existing remotely delivered intensive outpatient program (IOP) specifically for hospitalized patients with OUD. We then conducted a pilot feasibility and acceptability study to assess the program.
methodsThe 4-week IOP consisted of asynchronous video content and in-person peer support. The primary outcomes were the feasibility of recruitment, acceptability of the treatment as assessed by the completion of videos, and engagement with the peer recovery coach. Secondary outcomes included OUD treatment retention.
resultsOf the 12 participants, the mean age was 40.9 years, 58.3% were female, and 58.3% had an injection-related serious infection. Results demonstrated potentially acceptable recruitment feasibility (70.6%, 95% CI [48.9-92.3]), but the median percentage of video completion was only 2% (range: 0-16%) and the median percentage of engagement with recovery coach was 31.8% (range: 16.7-66.7%). All participants received medications for OUD (MOUD) during the hospital stay (methadone 83%, buprenorphine 17%), and 33.3% remained retained in MOUD treatment at 28 days.
conclusionsHospitalized patients with OUD desired additional support through an IOP along with MOUD. While recruitment feasibility was acceptable, the overall program was not. Future research should explore IOP content that is more personalized and engaging while also including peer support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.