ReviewBMC surgery2025
Enhancing surgical care for torture survivors: healing trauma, promoting recovery, and advancing best practices.
Review in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA significant proportion of refugees and asylum seekers have experienced torture, leading to complex, long-term physical and psychological health needs. Many require surgical care for trauma-related injuries but often face barriers such as fear, mistrust, and a lack of trauma-specific knowledge among healthcare professionals. In surgical settings, the absence of trauma-informed practices can contribute to retraumatisation, misdiagnosis, and inadequate care. This narrative review provides an overview offering clinical insights to underscore the importance of trauma-informed, interdisciplinary approaches in the surgical care of torture survivors. LITERATURE SEARCH: This narrative review is based on a targeted literature search conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science between August 2023 and January 2024. Relevant articles were identified through keyword-based searches and manual reference screening. The review focused on literature addressing somatic and surgical care for torture survivors, with an emphasis on trauma-informed approaches. An iterative process was used until thematic saturation was achieved. REVIEW OF LITERATURE: Torture survivors frequently suffer from chronic physical conditions—such as brain injuries, fractures, contractures, hearing loss, and genitourinary damage—that may require surgical intervention. Despite these needs, they often face significant barriers to care, including fear, mistrust, and a lack of trauma-specific competence among healthcare professionals. The literature highlights that many survivors receive conflicting diagnoses and inadequate treatment within surgical services, contributing to confusion and loss of trust. Surgical teams are often unprepared to identify signs of torture or manage their complex psychological and physical effects. A trauma-informed, interdisciplinary approach is essential to address these gaps.
conclusionsSurgical care for torture survivors must integrate trauma-informed practices at all stages to ensure safety, dignity, and effective treatment. Interdisciplinary collaboration is essential. Further research is needed to evaluate these approaches and understand their long-term impact on surgical treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.