Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40751192›Full record

ReviewBMC health services research2025

Decolonizing global health: Africa's pursuit of pharmaceutical sovereignty.

Moses Mulumba, Jessica Oga, Nana Koomson, Tasha-Aliya Kara, Adanze Nge Cynthia, Lisa Forman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Neuropsychiatry genetics in Africa.Nature communications · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Moses MulumbaAfya na Haki, Kampala, Uganda.
Jessica OgaAfya na Haki, Kampala, Uganda. oreoluwa@afyanahaki.org.
Nana KoomsonDalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Canada.
Tasha-Aliya KaraDalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Canada.
Adanze Nge CynthiaAfya na Haki, Kampala, Uganda.
Lisa FormanDalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfrica's continued reliance on imported medicines, vaccines, and active pharmaceutical ingredients is the direct legacy of colonial extraction, intensified by the structural-adjustment era's dismantling of state-owned drug plants and cemented by intellectual-property regimes that keep critical know-how offshore. The COVID-19 vaccine scramble exposed the full cost of this vulnerability and has triggered a continent-wide push for pharmaceutical sovereignty-an explicit, decolonizing agenda to localize research, regulation, and production. This review distils the latest evidence on the barriers that still block that transition and maps the regulatory, financial, technological, and civic opportunities most likely to accelerate it. METHODOLOGY: A critical narrative literature review was conducted. Six databases (PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, Google Scholar, BMJ Global Health and the Institute for Economic Justice repository) were searched for English-language records published January 2000-May 2025 using the terms Africa AND (pharmaceutic OR vaccine OR API) AND (sovereign OR manufactur OR decoloni). Grey literature from AU agencies, Africa CDC, WHO and UNIDO was added. Forty-five documents met inclusion criteria and were included in the article. Reflexive thematic analysis identified recurrent barriers and enabling pathways; intercoder reliability was ensured through independent coding and consensus meetings.

resultsFour structurally reinforcing barriers dominate the evidence base: (i) TRIPS-based patent exclusivities that restrict technology transfer; (ii) fragmented and immature regulatory capacity (iii) chronic under-investment; and (iv) import-biased procurement. The countervailing opportunities center on (i) AMA-led regulatory harmonization, (ii) pooled-demand instruments (iii) technology-transfer partnerships and (iv) civic-sector mobilization.

conclusionAfrica now possesses the regulatory blueprint, pooled-demand incentives, and emerging technology platforms to localize production of medicines and vaccines. However, its realization is dependent on synchronizing these levers by easing IP constraints, completing AMA-led regulatory convergence, mobilizing concessional finance for API and bulk-drug capacity, and reforming procurement to reward local value. If pursued in concert, these steps can convert pharmaceutical sovereignty from a political slogan into a resilient, continent-wide industrial reality- anchoring Africa's wider agenda to decolonize global health.

Indexed as

COVID-19 VaccinesDrug IndustryGlobal HealthAfricaCOVID-19HumansCOVID-19 VaccinesAfrican medicines agencyAnd vaccine manufacturingDecolonizing global healthIntellectual propertyPharmaceutical sovereigntyPooled procurement

Identifiers

PMID40751192
PMCPMC12315266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.