ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
Development of a machine learning model for predicting renal damage in children with closed spinal dysraphism.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRenal damage in closed spinal dysraphism (CSD), primarily linked to neurogenic bladder dysfunction, significantly impacts long-term patient outcomes by increasing the risk of chronic kidney disease. Identifying patients at highest risk for renal damage is essential for implementing early interventions, improving bladder management strategies, and preserving renal function. This study aims to develop an effective machine learning model to predict renal damage in children with CSD.
methodsThis retrospective study included 110 children with CSD. We developed four machine learning models (logistic regression, support vector machine, decision tree, and extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost]), and compared their predictive performances. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate predictive performance. The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) algorithm and Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) were used to interpret the optimal model.
resultsThe XGBoost model showed the best predictive performance (AUC = 0.957) among the four machine learning models. Through the SHAP analysis, abnormal radiological lower urinary tract findings, female sex, and high-grade vesicoureteral reflux were identified as the three most influential features in predicting renal damage.
conclusionOur study effectively developed a model that accurately predicted renal damage in children with CSD based on the XGBoost algorithm, demonstrating its potential to achieve good predictive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.