Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40751187›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2025

Development of a machine learning model for predicting renal damage in children with closed spinal dysraphism.

Yu He, Wan-Liang Guo, Ming-Chang Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yu HeDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215025, China.
Wan-Liang GuoDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215025, China. gwlsuzhou@163.com.
Ming-Chang ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215025, China. 972424678@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRenal damage in closed spinal dysraphism (CSD), primarily linked to neurogenic bladder dysfunction, significantly impacts long-term patient outcomes by increasing the risk of chronic kidney disease. Identifying patients at highest risk for renal damage is essential for implementing early interventions, improving bladder management strategies, and preserving renal function. This study aims to develop an effective machine learning model to predict renal damage in children with CSD.

methodsThis retrospective study included 110 children with CSD. We developed four machine learning models (logistic regression, support vector machine, decision tree, and extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost]), and compared their predictive performances. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate predictive performance. The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) algorithm and Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) were used to interpret the optimal model.

resultsThe XGBoost model showed the best predictive performance (AUC = 0.957) among the four machine learning models. Through the SHAP analysis, abnormal radiological lower urinary tract findings, female sex, and high-grade vesicoureteral reflux were identified as the three most influential features in predicting renal damage.

conclusionOur study effectively developed a model that accurately predicted renal damage in children with CSD based on the XGBoost algorithm, demonstrating its potential to achieve good predictive performance.

Indexed as

Kidney DiseasesMachine LearningSpinal DysraphismChildChild, PreschoolDecision TreesFemaleHumansInfantLogistic ModelsMalePredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSupport Vector MachineUrinary Bladder, NeurogenicClosed spinal dysraphismExtreme gradient boostingMachine learningRenal damage

Identifiers

PMID40751187
PMCPMC12315280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.