ArticleBMC nursing2025
Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward azithromycin infusion reactions among pediatric nurses: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInfusion-related adverse reactions to azithromycin, though uncommon, can pose serious risks in pediatric care, warranting focused attention from nursing professionals. Pediatric nurses are key to early identification and intervention, but their knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) regarding such events remain unclear.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey among 835 pediatric nurses from 53 hospitals in Zhejiang Province, China. A custom-designed, expert-reviewed questionnaire assessed demographic characteristics, azithromycin-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability testing (Cronbach's alpha) were used to evaluate the instrument's validity. Mediation analysis was performed to examine the indirect effects of knowledge and job satisfaction on practice, with attitude as a mediator.
resultsThe CFA indicated acceptable model fit (RMSEA = 0.043; CFI = 0.892), and internal consistency was moderate to good across domains (α = 0.637-0.84). Nurses demonstrated moderate knowledge (mean score 13.59/20), constructive attitudes (28.43/35), and high levels of self-reported practice (42.30/50). Job satisfaction and 5-8 years of experience were associated with better attitudes and practices. Mediation analysis revealed that knowledge (β = 0.11, P = 0.034) and job satisfaction (β = 0.49, P < 0.001) directly influenced attitude, which in turn mediated their effects on practice. Knowledge had only an indirect effect on practice (β = 0.04, P = 0.042), underscoring the importance of attitudinal reinforcement.
conclusionsPediatric nurses possess limited pharmacological knowledge but exhibit safe infusion practices, likely driven by standard protocols and clinical experience. Educational interventions should go beyond factual training to include attitude-shaping strategies. Hospitals should prioritize structured in-service programs, simulation-based learning, and pre-infusion checklists to enhance safety. Future large-scale, multi-center, and longitudinal studies across diverse regions are warranted to validate these findings and enhance their generalizability. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.