Observational studyNeurosurgical review2025
Three-dimensional analysis of the gait in patients with cervical myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment.
Observational study in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Observational, longitudinal, and prospective study. To describe gait characteristics and evaluate the impact of decompressive surgery on improving gait quality after surgical spine decompression in patients diagnosed with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). All participants underwent a three-dimensional gait assessment before the surgical procedure, three months, six months and one year of follow up. The outcome measures used were the "Gait Profile Score" (GPS) and the "Movement Analysis Profile" (MAP). The GPS and MAP variables of healthy individuals from a database were compared with the values obtained from our study patients. Ultimately, all variables were compared between the preoperative period and the postoperative evaluations. There was no difference in the GPS and MAP values in the postoperative period for the variables General Total, Ankle flexion and extension, Pelvis inclination, Hip abduction and adduction, Pelvis rotation and Foot progression. Compared to the preoperative time results, there was a difference in the Pelvis Obliquity GPS and MAP at 3 and 6 months. We also found differences in hip flexion and extension, knee flexion and extension, and hip rotation in the late postoperative period (one-year follow-up) compared to the preoperative period GPS and MAP results. In addition to characterizing the gait analysis in patients with CSM, this study demonstrated the gait changes in patients with CSM during the 1-year clinical follow-up after surgical treatment with decompression of the cervical spinal canal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40751119What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.