ArticleBioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy2025
Individual Prescribing Incentives for Biosimilars in Selected European Countries and the USA: a Scoping Literature Review.
Article in BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The uptake of biosimilar medicines in Europe and the USA remains highly variable and at times slow, despite the significant potential for cost savings for both patients and healthcare systems. One of the most recommended measures to address this issue is the use of prescribing incentives. On the basis of a well-defined concept of individual prescribing incentives, we conducted a scoping literature review aimed at exploring their role in promoting the uptake of biosimilars in six countries with advanced healthcare systems (the USA, Denmark, England, Italy, France and Germany), with a particular focus on gain-sharing initiatives. Online databases and other sources were used to identify papers published between 2010 and 2023, resulting in the selection of 47 publications. The results suggest that there are few real-world programmes that use provider incentives offered by health systems to encourage prescribing of biosimilars. However, we found gain-sharing schemes of particular interest in England, Italy, France and Germany, where savings are reinvested to improve the quality of care, incentivizing physicians and raising satisfaction, but without financial rewards. In contrast, we found unplanned disincentives hindering the uptake of biosimilars in the USA, as well as very successful top-down strategies that do not rely on individual incentives, including centralized procurement in Denmark, although it remains to be seen whether the success is idiosyncratic to its specific circumstances. In addition, the hypothesis that gain-sharing initiatives with the aforementioned characteristics are more adaptable to different cultural, organizational and political settings to promote biosimilar prescribing merits further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40751113What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.