SynthesisEvidence-based dentistry2025
Supervised toothbrushing programs: evaluating impact, barriers, and facilitators - a mixed-method umbrella review.
Synthesis in Evidence-based dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Facilitators and Barriers That Influence Oral Health Behaviours Among Adolescents: A Systematic Review.International dental journal · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the effectiveness of supervised toothbrushing programs in improving oral health outcomes among children and adolescents aged 3 to 18 years and to explore stakeholders' perceptions in implementing and sustaining tooth brushing programs.
methodsThis mixed-method umbrella review followed JBI methodology and PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search was conducted across databases including MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, Epistemonikos, ProQuest, and Google Scholar. A total of 159 articles were identified, and after screening, three systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria. The quantitative and qualitative findings were synthesized using a convergent segregated approach. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was applied to map barriers and facilitators influencing program adoption and sustainability.
resultsThe quantitative synthesis included one systematic review with four included trials, two of which found statistically significant reductions in dental caries with supervised toothbrushing. The qualitative synthesis (two mixed-method systematic reviews) revealed key facilitators and barriers. The most prominent enablers and barriers identified across these reviews were knowledge about oral health/tooth brushing, social influences, and environmental context and resources. Specifically, the knowledge domain received 32 enabler responses and 25 barrier responses, underscoring the importance of understanding oral health practices to improve toothbrushing behavior. Social support garnered 35 enabler responses and 26 barrier responses, highlighting the role of a supportive environment in enhancing adherence to toothbrushing routines.
conclusionThis review highlights the effectiveness of supervised toothbrushing programs in reducing dental caries. The qualitative synthesis, guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), identifies key barriers and facilitators, including knowledge gaps, environmental constraints, social influences, and behavioural regulation factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40751088What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.