ArticleScientific reports2025
Prevalence and associated factors of vitreoretinal interface disorders using multicolour OCT among Chinese population in Fujian eye study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence, associations and ROC prediction of vitreoretinal interface disorders (VRI) among residents aged 50 years and older in Fujian Eye Study.The Fujian Eye Study is a population-based cross-sectional eye study in Fujian province, Southeast China. Residents aged 50 years and older were enrolled and did the questionnaire, physical and ophthalmological examinations. Multicolor OCT was used for high-resolution imaging of central retina in both eyes. Stata/SE 15.1 software was used for statistic analysis, a multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify associated factors for high myopia and the ROC curve analysis was used to verify the credibility.A total of 8173 residents were finally included in this study. The prevalence of VRI was 8.99% (95%CI: 8.37-9.61%), including 93.61% (95%CI: 91.84-95.37%) with ERM, 14.56% (95%CI: 12.01-17.11%) with any type of macular hole (MH) in at least one eye, and 2.45% (95%CI: 1.33-3.57%) with vitreoretinal traction (VRT). ERM was the most common type of VRI. Multiple logistic regression showed urban residency and coastal location were independently associated with VRI.The prevalence of VRI was high among Chinese adults, and ERM was the most common type of VRI. VRI was associated with urban residency and coastal location. This study provided the population-based data on the prevalence of VRI disorders in the Chinese elderly and filled in the global data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.