Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40751037›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2025

Swingers in Germany: Sociodemography and Event Preferences Assessed from Harvested Web Data.

Oliver Maor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Oliver MaorFernUniversität in Hagen, Universitätsstraße 47, 58097, Hagen, Germany. oliver@maor.de.ORCID 0009-0000-9759-2038

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This exploratory study investigated Germany's heterosexual swinger community within the consensual non-monogamy spectrum. It used anonymized, verified data harvested in September and October 2023 from Joyclub, the leading online platform in Germany focused on sexual exploration. The first part examined anonymized profiles from self-declared swingers, totaling 22,973 individuals, revealing a mature demographic, with median ages of 44 for women and 46 for men. Despite high regional variations, no clear correlations between swinger prevalence and regional socioeconomic factors were found. Subgroup analysis identified BDSM-affiliated swingers and those involved in open relationships or polyamory, with a higher concentration in urban areas. The second study assessed 14,008 attendees at 82 categorized swinger events, which showed a preference for sex-focused events across all age strata. Contrary to the male-centric perspective, the data revealed events strongly focused on women's preferences, including those targeting younger male partners. Events also combined sexual activities with social elements and drew participants from greater distances, indicating a strong commitment to the community lifestyle. A prominent presence of solo women was observed, contradicting earlier findings from other countries. Reduced pricing for women did not correlate with higher attendance, questioning the effectiveness of such strategies. The use of verified data and a large sample size provides robust insights into Germany's swinger community, emphasizing gender participation and regional variations. This study offers an empirical foundation for future research and highlights the importance of local contexts and terminology in studying sexual behavior.

Indexed as

Paraphilic DisordersSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersAdultFemaleGermanyHeterosexualityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSocioeconomic FactorsConsensual non-monogamyData harvestingGermanySexualitySwingers

Identifiers

PMID40751037
PMCPMC12457489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.