Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40751034›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2025

The Role of Autonomy in Multi-Partnered Relationships.

Sonja Bröning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sonja BröningFaculty of Human Sciences, Medical School Hamburg, University of Applied Sciences and Medical University, Am Kaiserkai 1, 20457, Hamburg, Germany. sonja.broening@medicalschool-hamburg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-9803-9779

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyamory is a form of consensual non-monogamy (CNM) that openly endorses multiple romantic and sexual relationships. Previous research has reported high satisfaction and need fulfillment in polyamorous relationships. However, the feasibility of polyamory for a wider population given the societal monogamy norm is highly debated. Desire for relational autonomy, such as the freedom to love multiple partners and be sexually intimate with them, is a widespread motive for engaging in CNM. In this qualitative study, we explored if and how this kind of autonomy was experienced by polyamorous individuals in daily life. Autonomy in relationships was conceptualized through the differential lenses of self-determination theory, attachment theory, and differentiation theory. We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews with German-speaking polyamorists. The material was analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis to answer the following research questions: (1) In what ways is personal autonomy created and expressed in polyamorous relationships? (2) Are autonomy-related needs fulfilled in polyamorous relationships? (3) How important is personal autonomy for polyamorous individuals? Overall, participants reported a high need for and level of "doing autonomy" in their polyamorous relationships. Four central aspects of this autonomy emerged: assertive communication, independent emotion regulation, self-congruent lifestyle, and valuing freedom. Different nuances of these four aspects are discussed with regard to the study's research questions and to their implications for mental health professionals working with polyamorous clients.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsPersonal AutonomySexual BehaviorSexual PartnersAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchYoung AdultAutonomyConsensual non-monogamyPolyamoryQualitative interviewsReflexive thematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID40751034
PMCPMC12457472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.