ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025
Dual tension band wiring for adolescent supracondylar fractures of the humerus: mechanical assessment and a clinical series.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal fixation technique of adolescent supracondylar fractures of the humerus (A-SCFH) remains inconclusive. To prove the efficacy of Dual Tension Band Wiring (DTBW), the mechanical performance was compared to the other pinning constructs, i.e., Lateral Divergent Pining (LDP), Cross Pining (CP) and Dual CP. The clinical outcomes of the DTBW in A-SCFH were retrospectively described.
methodsBone specimens with a supracondylar fracture acquired from computed tomography images of a patient were fabricated using a three-dimensional printing technique. The fracture was stabilized with pining techniques to create those four constructs. Each of constructs was mechanically tested under posterior bending, medial bending, lateral bending, and torsion. Maximum force, displacement at maximum force, maximum torque, rotational displacement at maximum torque, and construct stiffness were collected and calculated from the result of mechanical test. For the case series, 15 A-SCFH was operated on the DTBW. The reviewed data included time to union, perioperative complications, arc of elbow motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score.
resultsThe DTBW revealed a greater maximum force, and construct stiffness compared to the other constructs in most of the loading conditions. According to the case series, all fractures were consolidated with a mean union time of 7.2 weeks (range 6-10). By MEPS, all patients were determined to be good-to-excellent. The mean arc of elbow motion was 130 degrees (range 120-140) with a mean DASH score of 7.9 (range 2.5-17.5).
conclusionBy mechanical performance and clinical outcomes, the DTBW can be an effective and reliable technique in management of A-SCFH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40751031What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.