Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40751005›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2025

Advancing engineering design strategies for targeted cancer nanomedicine.

Victoria F Gomerdinger, Namita Nabar, Paula T Hammond

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Modern Cyanine Dye-Based Photosensitizers for Medical Applications.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. HAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Victoria F Gomerdinger *Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1122-0482
Namita Nabar *Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5159-4211
Paula T HammondDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. hammond@mit.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engineered nanoparticles have greatly expanded cancer treatment by encapsulating and delivering therapeutic and diagnostic agents, otherwise limited by poor pharmacokinetics and toxicity, to target tumour cells. Leveraging our increased understanding of the tumour microenvironment, nanomedicine has expanded to additionally target key tissues and cells implicated in tumorigenesis, such as immune and stromal cells, to improve potency and further mitigate off-target toxicities. To design nanocarriers that overcome the body's physiological barriers to access tumours, the field has explored broader routes of administration and nanoparticle design principles, beyond the enhanced permeation and retention effect. This Review explores the advantages of non-covalent surface modifications of nanoparticles, along with other surface modifications, to modulate nanoparticle trafficking from the injection site, into tumour and lymphoid tissues, to the target cell, and ultimately its subcellular fate. Using electrostatic or other non-covalent techniques, nanoparticle surfaces can be decorated with native and synthetic macromolecules that confer highly precise cell and tissue trafficking. Rational design can additionally minimize detection and clearance by the immune system and prolong half-life - key to maximizing efficacy of therapeutic cargos. Finally, we outline how cancer nanomedicine continues to evolve by incorporating learnings from novel screening technologies, computational approaches and patient-level data to design efficacious targeted therapies.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug Delivery SystemsNanomedicineNanoparticlesNeoplasmsAnimalsHumansTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.