ArticleScientific reports2025
The effects of annual cycle stages and life-history traits on feather abrasion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissue wear in animals occurs consistently and can impair their functionality. In birds, abrasion - which reduces the feathered surface area - is caused by various factors. However, little is known about the underlying mechanisms, patterns and immediate consequences of feather abrasion. Given the lack of reliable and widely accepted methods for quantifying feather abrasion, we present the Minimum Convex Abrasion Area (MCAA), a novel approach for its measurement. This method facilitates the estimation of feather abrasion in both museum specimens and living birds, enabling an exploration of the factors influencing abrasion across different phases of the avian annual- and life-cycle. We analysed 283 feathers from 21 passerine species, revealing that the highest rate of feather abrasion occurs during the breeding season, with a significant reduction in feather surface area compared to other periods of the annual cycle. Surprisingly, migration periods, despite their high metabolic demands and long-distance movement, do not significantly contribute to feather abrasion. The timing of feather moult plays a pivotal role in influencing abrasion rates during the breeding season, with species that undergo moult nearer to the breeding season, during winter (pre-breeding moult), showing significantly lower abrasion rates than those moulting before the autumn migration (post-breeding moult), likely a result of the weakening of the feather structure over time. These findings highlight the importance of moult timing for feather abrasion rate and maintaining plumage integrity during the reproduction season. The application of the proposed abrasion measurement method is expected to facilitate better understanding of plumage function and properties, as well as bird moult strategies, thereby enhancing our comprehension of avian ecology, biomechanics, life-history traits and sexual selection, as well as their evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.