Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40750980›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Models for sustainable management of livestock waste based on neural network architectures.

Anatoliy Tryhuba, Krzysztof Mudryk, Inna Tryhuba, Marian Kotsylovskyi, Dmytro Sorokin, Olena Bezaltychna, Pawel Pysz, Taras Hutsol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anatoliy TryhubaDepartment of Information Technologies, Lviv National Environmental University, Dublyany, 80-381, Ukraine.
Krzysztof MudrykUkrainian University in Europe - Foundation, Balicka 116, 30-149, Krakow, Poland.
Inna TryhubaDepartment of Information Technologies, Lviv National Environmental University, Dublyany, 80-381, Ukraine.
Marian KotsylovskyiDepartment of Information Technologies, Lviv National Environmental University, Dublyany, 80-381, Ukraine.
Dmytro SorokinDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Electromechanics and Electrotechnology, National University of Life and Environmental Science of Ukraine, Kyiv, 03-041, Ukraine.
Olena BezaltychnaDepartment of Technology of Production and Processing of Livestock Products, Odesa State Agrarian University, Panteleimonivska Str. 13, Odesa, 65-012, Ukraine.
Pawel PyszDepartment of Machine Operation, Ergonomics and Production Processes, Faculty of Production and Power Engineering, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Balicka 116B, 30-149, Krakow, Poland.
Taras HutsolDepartment of Machine Operation, Ergonomics and Production Processes, Faculty of Production and Power Engineering, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Balicka 116B, 30-149, Krakow, Poland. wte.inter@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study addresses the problem of minimizing the environmental impact of livestock production while improving the efficiency of livestock waste-to-energy conversion. A sustainable management approach based on neural network models is proposed and substantiated, focusing on predicting livestock waste generation and optimizing farm configurations. The novelty of this work lies in the development and validation of a multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural network model tailored to regional and production characteristics of cattle farms in western Ukraine. The approach includes 11 stages, from data preprocessing and feature selection to multiobjective optimization and emission assessment. The optimized MLP model demonstrated high predictive performance, achieving a mean squared error (MSE) of 0.0005 and a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 6.51%, compared to 8.01% for the baseline model. The study confirms that feeding rations significantly affect both waste generation and greenhouse gas emissions. Farms using protein-rich or concentrated diets show increased biogas production potential but also higher CO₂-equivalent emissions (kg/year), while roughage-based diets reduce methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions, lowering environmental impact. Optimization results reveal a non-linear relationship between herd size and sustainability indicators. The most effective emission reduction was achieved on farms with 900 cattle, where CO₂-equivalent emissions decreased from 4,560,590 to 3,830,100 kg/year. Simultaneously, biogas production increased by 7-16%, exceeding 1,100,002 m

Indexed as

LivestockNeural Networks, ComputerWaste ManagementAnimal HusbandryAnimalsCattleMethaneModels, TheoreticalUkraineMethaneAnimal husbandryBiogasEmissionsEnergy supplyEnvironmental sustainabilityNeural network modelSustainable managementWaste

Identifiers

PMID40750980
PMCPMC12317077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.