ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation and optimisation of regular RC frame structures of varying heights with graphene oxide.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Frame structures are commonly used in places with low seismic activity. Their structural behaviour is characterised by low rigidity and lateral resistance, due to the small sections of the supporting elements (columns), and for this reason, this structural typology requires the help of rigid elements such as filler, structural walls, or other bracing elements. The use of materials in the sections that can improve the resistant behaviour of these structures, such as graphene oxide (GO), offers an alternative solution to the massive use of walls. The results presented here show that introducing small amounts of GO into the composition of the concrete (4% with respect to the weight of the cement used in traditional 30 MPa concrete test specimens) in the sections (beams and columns) improves the mechanical and resistant behaviour of framed structures by between 3 and 15%, and that this effect increases as the structures increase in height. In this research, regular frame structures in plan and elevation of three, eight and 15 storeys are analysed, with proportions of steel equal to 2.5% in the columns and 4% in the beams. Optimisation of the structural sections of the frames using GO concrete, in which the ultimate strengths of the structures with traditional concrete are matched, gives reductions in the amount of concrete in the sections of between 10 and 13%, with the greatest reductions in the highest structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.