ArticleScientific reports2025
Network pharmacology analyses and corresponding validation of the mechanistic effects of Yangyin Tongnao Granules in ischemic stroke.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Yangyin Tongnao Granule on Cerebral Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rats.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Yangyin Tongnao Granules (YYTN) is a traditional Chinese medicinal prescription that has been proposed to offer value as a treatment for ischemic stroke (IS). The mechanistic basis for its function, however, remains to be established. This study investigates the molecular mechanism of YYTN in treating IS through the HIF-1 signaling pathway. Two databases were accessed to determine the ingredients and targets of YYTN, while genes associated with IS were identified through GeneCards, DisGeNET, and Drugbank. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) analyses were conducted in Cytoscape. GO and KEGG analyses were performed in R4.2.3 and used to clarify the functions of particular genes and associated signaling pathways. Core targets associated with YYTN and IS were analyzed through molecular docking analyses. Corresponding analyses of associated genes and proteins of interest were then conducted in a rat model of cerebral ischemia using techniques including ELISAs, Western immunoblotting, immunohistochemistry and qPCR. YYTN was found to contain 150 active compounds, among which the core compounds were 3,9-di-O-methylnissolin, vallesiachotamine, and chrysotoxine. The most important targets of YYTN in the context of treating IS were identified as SRC, PIK3R1, and STAT3. The GO terms (biological process, cellular component, and molecular function) most closely associated with the action of YYTN were positive regulation of the MAPK cascade, membrane raft, and transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase activity, respectively. The HIF-1 pathway was one of the top 15 most enriched KEGG pathways, with this pathway being associated with HIF-1α, VEGFA, and PAI-1. In molecular docking analyses, tested targets exhibited stable binding. Experimental analyses provided potential support for the ability of YYTN to exert beneficial therapeutic effects in IS through increases in HIF-1α levels in the brain tissue together upregulation of VEGFA and downregulation of PAI-1. These results provided support for the above network pharmacology analyses, confirming that YYTN is capable of impacting HIF-1α, VEGFA, and PAI-1 expression while also altering the activity of the HIF-1 signaling pathway. These results offer support for the network pharmacology results, demonstrating the ability of YYTN to exert therapeutic benefits in IS by modulating HIF-1α, VEGFA, and PAI-1 gene and protein expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.