ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep-learning model for embryo selection using time-lapse imaging of matched high-quality embryos.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- From time-lapse to morphokinetics: neural ODE dynamics for reliable embryo stage transition timing.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Contemporary Approaches Towards the Optimization of Embryo Implantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Embryo Selection: Current Approaches and Clinical Implications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Developmental Morphokinetics and the Transcriptomic Profile of Bovine First-Cleaved Embryos: Normal vs. Abnormal Divisions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Assisted Reproductive Technology: Bridging Prediction and Clinical Judgment.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Modern Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) Management: Intelligent Drug Delivery and Metabolic Reprogramming for Ovarian Restoration and Fertility Optimization.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Investigating discrepancies in accuracy, agreement and interpretability for single-frame embryo classification tasks conducted by embryologists and deep learning models.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Multi-modal Artificial Intelligence of Embryo Grading and Pregnancy Prediction in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Review.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- EnhancingGynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Time-lapse imaging and deep-learning algorithms are promising tools to assess the most viable embryos and improve embryo selection in IVF laboratories. Here, we developed and validated a deep learning model based on self-supervised contrastive learning. The model was developed with a new approach based on matched KID (Known Implantation Data) embryos derived from the same cohort of a stimulation cycle, both judged to be of good quality according to classical morphological criteria and morphokinetics, transferred fresh or frozen, but with a different implantation fate (clinical pregnancy vs. failure of implantation). We used self-supervised contrastive learning to train convolutional neural networks to ensure an unbiased and comprehensive learning of the morphokinetics features of the embryos, followed by a Siamese neural network fine-tuning and an XGBoost final prediction model to prevent overfitting. 1580 embryo videos of 460 patients were included between January 2020 and February 2023. With the knowledge of the implantation outcome of a previous transfer of an embryo derived from the same stimulation cycle, this model could predict the pregnancy outcome of the subsequent transfer with an AUC of 0.57. Without any knowledge of transfer history, the model achieved a satisfactory performance in predicting implantation (AUC = 0.64). This model could be considered as an adjunct tool for biologists to better select embryos and reduce the number of useless transfers per patient, when a cohort with several embryos classified as good quality by classical criteria is obtained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.