Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40750949›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2025

Deep learning-based super-resolution US radiomics to differentiate testicular seminoma and non-seminoma: an international multicenter study.

Yafang Zhang, Shilin Lu, Chuan Peng, Shichong Zhou, Irene Campo, Michele Bertolotto, Qian Li, Zhiyuan Wang, Dong Xu, Yun Wang and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yafang Zhang *Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China.
Shilin Lu *Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China.
Chuan PengDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China.
Shichong ZhouDepartment of Ultrasonography, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Irene CampoDepartment of Radiology, University of Trieste, Gorizia, Italy.
Michele BertolottoDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Qian LiDepartment of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhiyuan WangDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Dong XuDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Yun WangDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Kunming, China.
Jinshun XuDepartment of Ultrasound, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Qinfu WuDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhuhai Hospital, Guangdong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhuhai, China.
Xiaoying HuDepartment of Ultrasound, Linyi Cancer Hospital, Linyi, China.
Wei ZhengDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China. zhengwei@sysucc.org.cn.
Jianhua ZhouDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China. zhoujh@sysucc.org.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2096-8126

Funding

Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Research Institute No. Q202313National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 82320108011Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province No. 2023A1515011564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSubvariants of testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) significantly affect therapeutic strategies and patient prognosis. However, preoperatively distinguishing seminoma (SE) from non-seminoma (n-SE) remains a challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a deep learning-based super-resolution (SR) US radiomics model for SE/n-SE differentiation. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis international multicenter retrospective study recruited patients with confirmed TGCT between 2015 and 2023. A pre-trained SR reconstruction algorithm was applied to enhance native resolution (NR) images. NR and SR radiomics models were constructed, and the superior model was then integrated with clinical features to construct clinical-radiomics models. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by ROC analysis (AUC) and compared with radiologists' assessments using the DeLong test.

resultsA total of 486 male patients were enrolled for training (n = 338), domestic (n = 92), and international (n = 59) validation sets. The SR radiomics model achieved AUCs of 0.90, 0.82, and 0.91, respectively, in the training, domestic, and international validation sets, significantly surpassing the NR model (p < 0.001, p = 0.031, and p = 0.001, respectively). The clinical-radiomics model exhibited a significantly higher across both domestic and international validation sets compared to the SR radiomics model alone (0.95 vs 0.82, p = 0.004; 0.97 vs 0.91, p = 0.031). Moreover, the clinical-radiomics model surpassed the performance of experienced radiologists in both domestic (AUC, 0.95 vs 0.85, p = 0.012) and international (AUC, 0.97 vs 0.77, p < 0.001) validation cohorts.

conclusionsThe SR-based clinical-radiomics model can effectively differentiate between SE and n-SE. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This international multicenter study demonstrated that a radiomics model of deep learning-based SR reconstructed US images enabled effective differentiation between SE and n-SE. KEY POINTS: Clinical parameters and radiologists' assessments exhibit limited diagnostic accuracy for SE/n-SE differentiation in TGCT. Based on scrotal US images of TGCT, the SR radiomics models performed better than the NR radiomics models. The SR-based clinical-radiomics model outperforms both the radiomics model and radiologists' assessment, enabling accurate, non-invasive preoperative differentiation between SE and n-SE.

Indexed as

Non-seminomaRadiomicsSeminomaSuper-resolutionUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID40750949
PMCPMC12316629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.