Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40750940›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

Modeling memories, predicting prospections: Automated scoring of autobiographical detail narration using large language models.

Jonas Klus, Daniel E Cohen, Alexis N Garcia, Sarah Hennessy, Matthias R Mehl, Jessica R Andrews-Hanna, Matthew D Grilli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jonas KlusDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. jklus@arizona.edu.
Daniel E CohenDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Alexis N GarciaDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Sarah HennessyDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Matthias R MehlDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Jessica R Andrews-HannaDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Matthew D GrilliDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0089-3243

Funding

Regulatory and Human Study Operations (RHSO) Core CU19AG065169 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BARNES, CAROL A. · 2021 to 2025
$59.8M
Tracking autobiographical thoughts: a smartphone-based approach to identifying cognitive correlates of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers and risk factors in clinically normal older adultsR01AG068098 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Jessica Renee Andrews-Hanna, Matthew D Grilli · 2022 to 2026
$3.5M
Tracking autobiographical thoughts: a smartphone-based approach to the detection of cognitive and neural markers of Alzheimer's disease riskR56AG068098 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI ANDREWS-HANNA, JESSICA RENEE, GRILLI, MATTHEW D · 2020 to 2020
$642k
The episodic autobiographical memory hypothesis of preclinical Alzheimer's disease: Developing a new approach for early cognitive detection and measurement of Alzheimer's diseaseR03AG060271 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI GRILLI, MATTHEW D · 2019 to 2020
$154k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG068098NIA NIH HHS R03 AG060271NIA NIH HHS R56 AG068098NIA NIH HHS U19 AG065169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The autobiographical interview is a widely used tool for examining memory and related cognitive functions. It provides a standardized framework to differentiate between internal details, representing the episodic features of specific events, and external details, including semantic knowledge and other non-episodic information. This study introduces an automated scoring model for autobiographical memory and future thinking tasks, using large language models (LLMs) that can analyze personal event narratives without preprocessing. Building on the traditional autobiographical interview protocol, we fine-tuned a LLaMA-3 model to identify internal and external details at a narrative level. The model was trained and tested on narratives from 284 participants across three studies, spanning past and future thinking tasks, multiple age groups, and collected in lab and virtual interviews. Results demonstrate strong correlations with human scores of up to r = 0.87 on internal and up to r = 0.84 on external details, indicating the model aligns as closely with human raters as they do with each other. Additionally, as evidence of the algorithm's construct validity, the model replicated known age-related trends wherein cognitively normal older adults generate fewer internal and more external details than younger adults across three datasets, finding this age group difference even in one dataset where human raters did not. This automated approach offers a scalable alternative to manual scoring, making large-scale studies of human autobiographical memory more feasible. To facilitate access for researchers, we created a Jupyter Notebook with the automated model and instructions for applying it to new narratives.

Indexed as

LanguageMemory, EpisodicModels, PsychologicalNarrationAdolescentAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansLarge Language ModelsMaleMental RecallMiddle AgedThinkingYoung AdultAutobiographical memoryAutomated scoringFuture event thinkingLarge language modelNatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID40750940
PMCPMC12321244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.