Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40750872›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Application of deep learning models in gastric cancer pathology image analysis: a systematic scoping review.

Sijun Xia, Yuanze Xia, Ting Liu, Yiming Luo, Patrick Cheong-Iao Pang

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sijun XiaDepartment of Pathology, Sheyang County People's Hospital, Yancheng, 224300, Jiangsu, China.
Yuanze XiaFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, 999078, China.
Ting LiuFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, 999078, China.
Yiming LuoFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, 999078, China.
Patrick Cheong-Iao PangFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, 999078, China. mail@patrickpang.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate diagnosis and prognosis stratification of gastric cancer (GC) are crucial for effective treatment. However, traditional histopathological image analysis relies on the subjective judgment of pathologists, which is time-consuming and prone to errors. The emergence of deep learning (DL) models provides new ways to automate and improve the analysis of GC pathology images. This systematic review aims to evaluate the current application, challenges, and future directions of DL in GC pathology image analysis.

methodsThe study follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines and searched four databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore (as of June 19, 2025).

resultsThe initial search identified 520 articles, and 22 studies that met the inclusion criteria were finally included. The results show that DL models have performed excellently in GC detection, histological classification, and prognosis prediction. Some models even reached an accuracy of over 95% in GC detection. Convolutional neural networks (CNN) are the most commonly used DL models. However, current studies still have limitations, such as limited dataset size, lack of external validation, and insufficient data diversity. The applicability to different types and stages of GC is also unclear.

conclusionsFuture research must build larger, more diverse, and more representative datasets. These should cover a wider range of GC types and stages, and undergo rigorous clinical validation. This will help fully realize the potential of DL in GC pathology image analysis and ultimately improve clinical practice.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedStomach NeoplasmsHumansPrognosisDeep learningGastric cancerPathology imageSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40750872
PMCPMC12317529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.