ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Exploring suicidal thoughts among prospective university students: a study with applications of machine learning and GIS techniques.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Suicidal ideation and its determinants among Palestinian university students.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Biological Risk Factors for Suicidal Behavior in Children and Adolescents: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- No Thesis, No Future! Exploring the associations between research inaccessibility and suicidal ideation.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProspective university students are regarded as highly vulnerable to psychological issues, including suicide. Despite the complexity of suicidal behaviors, innovative methodologies like Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping and Machine Learning have not been fully explored for predictive modeling and risk assessment. This study aims to investigate the prevalence and risk factors associated with suicidal behavior, offering a thorough understanding of the spatial distribution and predictive factors of suicidality.
methodsData from 1,485 participants were collected on socio-demographic characteristics, admission-related variables, health behaviors, and familial factors. Logistic regression analysis identified significant risk factors, while Machine Learning algorithms, including CatBoost and K-Nearest Neighbors, were used for prediction.
resultsThe findings revealed a 20.5% prevalence of suicidal thoughts, with disparities across demographics and behaviors. Female participants, rural dwellers, and those from joint families exhibited higher suicidality rates. Repeat test-takers, academically struggling students, and those not coached professionally displayed elevated risks. Moreover, substance use, mental health issues, and family mental health and suicide history increased odds of suicidal behavior. GIS mapping identified regional variations, notably in the Sylhet division and Chittagong Hill Tracts. While, Machine Learning models were used to predict suicidal thoughts, with depression status as the most influential factor. Among all models, CatBoost achieved the best overall performance, with the lowest log loss, highest AUC, and strongest 95% confidence interval. KNN also performed well in accuracy, precision, and F1-score, but showed a slightly higher log loss, making CatBoost the most reliable model for predicting suicidal thoughts.
conclusionsThis study emphasizes the multifaceted nature of suicidal behavior, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions and support services to address mental health challenges and prevent suicide in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.