Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40750847›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2025

PGBTR: a powerful and general method for inferring bacterial transcriptional regulatory networks.

Wei-Cheng Gu, Bin-Guang Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wei-Cheng GuHubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Bin-Guang MaHubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China. mbg@mail.hzau.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31971184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting bacterial transcriptional regulatory networks (TRNs) through computational methods is a core challenge in systems biology, and there is still a long way to go. Here we propose a powerful, general, and stable computational framework called PGBTR (Powerful and General Bacterial Transcriptional Regulatory networks inference method), which employs Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to predict bacterial transcriptional regulatory relationships from gene expression data and genomic information. PGBTR consists of two main components: the input generation step PDGD (Probability Distribution and Graph Distance) and the deep learning model CNNBTR (Convolutional Neural Networks for Bacterial Transcriptional Regulation inference). On the real Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis datasets, PGBTR outperforms other advanced supervised and unsupervised learning methods in terms of AUROC (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve), AUPR (Area Under Precision-Recall Curve), and F1-score. Moreover, PGBTR exhibits greater stability in identifying real transcriptional regulatory interactions compared to existing methods. PGBTR provides a new software tool for bacterial TRNs inference, and its core ideas can be further extended to other molecular network inference tasks and other biological problems using gene expression data.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksSoftwareBacillus subtilisDeep LearningEscherichia coliGene Expression Regulation, BacterialNeural Networks, ComputerBacillus subtilisDeep learningEscherichia coliNetwork inferenceTranscriptional regulatory network

Identifiers

PMID40750847
PMCPMC12315386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.