Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40750830›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Dynamics and vibrational spectroscopy of quasi-one dimensional water wires inside carbon nanotubes of different diameter and chirality.

Deepak Ojha, Peter Saalfrank

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Deepak OjhaInstitute of Chemistry, Potsdam University, Karl-Liebknecht-Strasse 24-25, D-14476, Potsdam-Golm, Germany. ojha.deepak@uni-potsdam.de.
Peter SaalfrankInstitute of Chemistry, Potsdam University, Karl-Liebknecht-Strasse 24-25, D-14476, Potsdam-Golm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water strongly confined in nanostructures such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs) exhibits structural, dielectric, transport, dynamical and thermodynamical properties vastly different from bulk water, due to a strong modification of the (three-dimensional) hydrogen bond network. In this work, we mainly address the following aspects of extremely confined, quasi-one dimensional water chains in CNTs which have have not been emphasized much so far: The effect of chirality of the CNT, strong interactions with the hydrophobic walls and the (altered) vibrational response of confined water. Specifically, we have studied the (i) translation / diffusion, (ii) rotation / reorientation and (iii) vibrations of water chains confined within narrow carbon nanotubes (CNTs) with chirality indices (6,2), (6,4) and (6,6) using ab initio molecular dynamics. Special emphasis is on vibrational spectra, notably in the OH stretch region, obtained from fluctuations in the local OH stretching modes which were further employed to obtain two-dimensional infrared spectra and frequency-frequency correlation functions. We find that the vibrational distribution of water molecules under confinement is overall blue-shifted in comparison to bulk water, due to a breakdown of the three-dimensional hydrogen bond network. Further, the vibrational dynamics were found to dependent strongly upon the chirality and diameter of the CNTs, the latter causing stronger hydrophobic interactions with the walls of the nanotube. With respect to translational and rotational motion, the CNT-confined water molecules exhibit slower translational diffusion and faster reorientational motion compared to bulk liquid water for all cases simulated in this work.

Identifiers

PMID40750830
PMCPMC12317096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.