Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40750816›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparison of quality characteristics among 20 sweet potato varieties.

Kai Luo, Jie Zhang, Xudong Li, Jiachen Chen, Jie Zhu, Yuqi Li

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kai LuoSchool of Food Science and Technology, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, 441053, China.
Jie ZhangInstitute of Vegetable Science, Xiangyang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xiangyang, 441000, China.
Xudong LiSchool of Food Science and Technology, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, 441053, China.
Jiachen ChenSchool of Food Science and Technology, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, 441053, China.
Jie ZhuInstitute of Vegetable Science, Xiangyang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xiangyang, 441000, China.
Yuqi LiSchool of Food Science and Technology, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, 441053, China. yuqi.li@hbuas.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 42207525the Scientific research Project of Hubei Provincial Department of Education B2013097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of quality characteristics of sweet potato is an important basis for the selection and utilization of sweet potato varieties. The nutritional indexes (sugar content, drying rate, amylose content, amylopectin content, anthocyanin content), structural indexes (hardness, elasticity, cohesion, adhesibility, chewiness, resilience) and chroma of 20 sweet potato varieties were measured and significant analysis was conducted. The nutritional value, texture quality and processing suitability were evaluated. The results showed that the dry weight rates of sweet potato varieties 197-4 (36.2%) and 196-16 (33.5%) were high and 193-3 was low compared with other varieties, indicating varieties 197-4 and 196-16 were more suitable for flour production, and 193-3 were more suitable for fresh food. The single potato weight of 193-16 was the largest (674 g), and that of 198-2 was the smallest (143 g). The acre yield of 193-16 was the highest, which was 42 000 kg/hm

Indexed as

Ipomoea batatasAmylopectinAmyloseAnthocyaninsNutritive ValueStarchAmylopectinAmyloseAnthocyaninsStarchChromaNutritional indexProcessing typeSweet potatoTexture index

Identifiers

PMID40750816
PMCPMC12317121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.