ArticleScientific reports2025
Novel feature-based method for multi-modal biomedical image registration compared to intensity-based technique.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MALDI spatial proteomics: a mini review of approaches and techniques.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multimodal image registration plays a crucial role in biomedical research, enabling the integration of complementary information from different imaging techniques. We present a novel feature-based approach for multimodal image registration, alongside traditional intensity-based methods. Our method, inspired by SPP-net architecture, employs multi-level feature extraction for robust image alignment. Additionally, we perform t-SNE dimensionality reduction on the MALDI-MSI dataset to enhance feature discrimination and visualization. We evaluated both approaches using datasets from the ANHIR Grand Challenge and mass spectrometry imaging modalities (LA-ICP-MS and MALDI-MSI). The proposed feature-based method achieved comparable accuracy to optimized intensity-based approaches, with Dice Coefficients of 0.95 for ANHIR samples (e.g., COAD_05) and 0.97 for mass spectrometry data, while requiring approximately 50% less computational time. Quantitative evaluation through Mutual Information metrics and Hausdorff Distance demonstrated high registration accuracy across different tissue types and imaging modalities. These results establish our feature-based approach as an efficient alternative to traditional intensity-based methods for multimodal image registration in biomedical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.