Trial reportScientific reports2025
Bringing the museum into the hospital to promote cultural wellness in patients undergoing haemodialysis through a virtual reality tour.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies placed copies of artworks in hospital environments to reduce stress and anxiety of patients. This study aims to investigate the psychological effect of a virtual tour of a museum provided by a virtual reality (VR) system in chronic patients suffering from Chronic Renal Failure (CRF) during the administration of haemodialysis. Twenty-six patients were enrolled at the Hospital where usually underwent for receiving their conventional therapy (CT) for CRF. Their positive and negative affect was measured by PANAS at baseline (before), after CT, and after CT in which a virtual museum visit experience (VR) was added, with a randomized cross-over design. Psychological distress, assessed as the evaluation of positive and negative emotion through PANAS scale, resulted in statistical difference among trait (baseline), CT and VR examination (p = 0.001), with specific difference between positive and negative poles (p < 0.001). Patients reported positive emotions for VR (mean = 28.1 ± 7.5) very close to the baseline (mean = 28.2 ± 8.1), suggesting a potential use of this technology as palliative treatment during CT. Psychological distress associated with CRF was shown to be reduceable by the museal visit fruition through the VR system. This positive effect was reconducted to the so-called cultural wellness potentially induce by the cultural heritage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.