ArticleNature communications2025
Personalized ML-based wearable robot control improves impaired arm function.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Skin-Inspired Relative Elastic Contact Coefficient Toward Electroluminescent Tactus.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Monolithic 6-Axis Force/Torque Sensing by a Single Ultrathin Piezoceramic Shell.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Convergence of Soft Electronics and Artificial Intelligence: From Materials to Intelligent Systems.Nano-micro letters · 2026Review
- Increasing the power density of electrohydrodynamic pumps by mapping the fluid landscape.Science advances · 2026Article
- Convergence of need technology and culture driving the era of physical AI in medicine.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Innovation, Adaptation, and Human Dignity in Assistive Robotics in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Rehabilitation Medicine Perspective.Journal of biotechnology and biomedicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Portable wearable robots offer promise for assisting people with upper limb disabilities. However, movement variability between individuals and trade-offs between supportiveness and transparency complicate robot control during real-world tasks. We address these challenges by first developing a personalized ML intention detection model to decode user's motion intention from IMU and compression sensors. Second, we leverage a physics-based hysteresis model to enhance control transparency and adapt it for practical use in real-world tasks. Third, we combine and integrate these two models into a real-time controller to modulate the assistance level based on the user's intention and kinematic state. Fourth, we evaluate the effectiveness of our control strategy in improving arm function in a multi-day evaluation. For 5 individuals post-stroke and 4 living with ALS wearing a soft shoulder robot, we demonstrate that the controller identifies shoulder movement with 94.2% accuracy from minimal change in the shoulder angles (elevation: 3.4°, depression: 1.7°) and reduces arm-lowering force by 31.9% compared to a baseline controller. Furthermore, the robot improves movement quality by increasing their shoulder elevation/depression (17.5°), elbow (10.6°) and wrist flexion/extension (7.6°) ROMs; reducing trunk compensation (up to 25.4%); and improving hand-path efficiency (up to 53.8%).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.