Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40750766›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Pre-mRNA processing factors differentially impact coordination between co-transcriptional cleavage and transcription termination.

Xianhao Jin, Juzuo Li, Wenqin Lu, Xian Deng, Yanping Wei, Yi Shu, Bo Liu, Zhijian Liu, Yanping Long, Xinlong Zhu and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. RNA regulation in plants.Science China. Life sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Xianhao Jin *Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Engineering and Molecular Design, Institute of Plant and Food Science, Department of Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3137-1739
Juzuo Li *Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Engineering and Molecular Design, Institute of Plant and Food Science, Department of Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7771-3530
Wenqin LuShenzhen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Engineering and Molecular Design, Institute of Plant and Food Science, Department of Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Xian DengState Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics and National Center for Plant Gene Research, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2606-1525
Yanping WeiAgricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Yi ShuShenzhen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Engineering and Molecular Design, Institute of Plant and Food Science, Department of Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Bo LiuShenzhen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Engineering and Molecular Design, Institute of Plant and Food Science, Department of Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Zhijian LiuKey Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of Ministry of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-3836-7377
Yanping LongShenzhen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Engineering and Molecular Design, Institute of Plant and Food Science, Department of Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4512-0594
Xinlong ZhuShenzhen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Engineering and Molecular Design, Institute of Plant and Food Science, Department of Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Qili FeiAgricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0860-2175
Yiji XiaDepartment of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9543-8341
Qingshun Q LiBiomedical Sciences, College of Dental Medicine, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4105-1480
Scott D MichaelsDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Xiaofeng CaoState Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics and National Center for Plant Gene Research, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9871-0753
Michael LenhardInstitute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8661-6911
Jixian ZhaiShenzhen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Engineering and Molecular Design, Institute of Plant and Food Science, Department of Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China. zhaijx@sustech.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0217-0666

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32300479National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32325031Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Guangdong Natural Science Foundation) 2023A1515011997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Co-transcriptional cleavage and transcription termination are closely related processes during mRNA maturation, yet their coordination remains poorly understood due to difficulties in detecting these transient events. Here, we applied single-molecule nascent RNA sequencing to simultaneously capture the cleavage status and readthrough distance on the same nascent RNA molecules and characterize 14 mutants of various pre-mRNA processing factors in Arabidopsis. Our results reveal diverse roles for these processing factors in coordinating cleavage and termination: core components of CPSF and CstF complex stimulate both cleavage and termination, facilitating access to exoribonuclease AtXRN3; mutations in nuclear poly(A) polymerase PAPS1 and AtXRN3 caused delayed termination with minimal effects on cleavage, suggesting their roles are further downstream; BORDER proteins facilitate termination while simultaneously inhibiting cleavage, suggesting a complex interplay between these two actions; the phosphatase SSU72 specifically promotes efficient termination without affecting cleavage. Our method also enables us to distinguish cleaved readthrough transcripts from full-length readthrough, and we found termination factor FPA specifically promotes termination of cleaved readthrough, suggesting FPA facilitates access of AtXRN3 to the 3' cleavage product. Our comprehensive datasets reveal cleavage and termination are highly coordinated during pre-mRNA processing.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsRNA PrecursorsTranscription, GeneticTranscription Termination, GeneticCleavage And Polyadenylation Specificity FactorExoribonucleasesGene Expression Regulation, PlantmRNA Cleavage and Polyadenylation FactorsMutationRNA, MessengerRNA, PlantRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalArabidopsis ProteinsCleavage And Polyadenylation Specificity FactorExoribonucleasesmRNA Cleavage and Polyadenylation FactorsRNA, MessengerRNA, PlantRNA Precursors

Identifiers

PMID40750766
PMCPMC12316902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.