Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40750718›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2025

Nutritional composition and prediction of energy values of poultry offal meal and meat and bone meal for broilers.

Camilla Roana Costa de Oliveira, Carlos Bôa-Viagem Rabello, Paulo Borges Rodrigues, Claudia da Costa Lopes, Bruno Araújo Silva, Elainy Cristina Lopes, Maria do Carmo Mohaupt Marques Ludke, Lilian Francisco Arantes de Souza, Júlio Cézar Dos Santos Nascimento, Webert Aurino da Silva and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Camilla Roana Costa de OliveiraAnimal Science Department, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Carlos Bôa-Viagem RabelloAnimal Science Department, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Paulo Borges RodriguesAnimal Science Department, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, MG, Brazil.
Claudia da Costa LopesAnimal Science Departament, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Bruno Araújo SilvaAnimal Science Department, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Elainy Cristina LopesAnimal Science Department, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Maria do Carmo Mohaupt Marques LudkeAnimal Science Department, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Lilian Francisco Arantes de SouzaAnimal Science Department, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Júlio Cézar Dos Santos NascimentoAnimal Science Department, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Webert Aurino da SilvaAnimal Science Department, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Apolonio Gomes RibeiroAnimal Science Departament, Federal University of Paraiba, Areia, PB, Brazil.
Lucas Rannier Ribeiro Antonino CarvalhoDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet - Stockholm Sweden Biomedicum, 5B, Solnavägen 9, Stockholm, S-171 77, Sweden. lucas.carvalho@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5875-8573
Marcos José Batista Dos SantosAnimal Science Department, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the apparent metabolizable energy (AME) and nitrogen-corrected AME (AMEn) of poultry offal meal (POM) and meat and bone meal (MBM) in broilers at different ages. Three metabolism trials were conducted in the pre-initial (1–8 days), starter (14–22 days), and grower (28–36 days) phases using 840 Cobb-500 broilers. Birds were housed in metabolic cages, and excreta were collected using the partial collection method. The experiment followed a completely randomized design with seven treatments and six replicates, with 10, 6, and 4 birds per phase. Treatments included a control diet and six test diets (80% control + 20% test ingredient: POM 1, 2, 3; MBM 1, 2, 3). AMEn values ranged from 3,189.7 to 3,342.9 kcal/kg in POM and 2,292.1 to 2,345.4 kcal/kg in MBM. Multiple regression equations were developed to predict AMEn. For POM, the best equation was AMEn = 6802 ‒ 213.3 (ether extract) ‒ 127.3 (calcium) + 10.47 (age) (R² = 0.92). For MBM, the equation was AMEn = 2789 ‒ 72 (ether extract) + 14 (calcium) + 20.28 (age) (R² = 0.91). These equations effectively estimate AMEn based on chemical composition and broiler age.

Indexed as

Animal FeedBiological ProductsChickensEnergy MetabolismMeatMineralsNutritive ValueAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietEnergy IntakeMaleBiological Productsbone mealMineralsMeat and bone mealMetabolizable energyPoultry offal mealPrediction equation

Identifiers

PMID40750718
PMCPMC12316816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.