Observational studyLeukemia2025
Evaluating a predictive model of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy failure in a European-type cohort: a step towards population-specific tools.
Observational study in Leukemia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting therapeutic failure in patients with chronic phase-chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) remains a major challenge for personalized care management. The Sokal and EUTOS long-term survival scores were designed to predict CML-related mortality, but are also used to guide therapeutic choices, despite their poor performance for this purpose. A recent study proposed a refined predictive model of therapy failure specifically tailored for patients treated with imatinib and second-generation TKIs that showed promising results in a Chinese cohort. The present study evaluated the performance and applicability of this predictive model in a real-world, multicenter cohort from the French CML Observatory. The key differences identified between the Chinese and French cohorts (age, baseline hemoglobin levels, and treatment regimens) likely influenced the model performance. Specifically, the new model did not allow for discriminating risk groups effectively in the French cohort. However, the model reconstruction using this cohort identified other predictive variables (sex, leukocytosis, comorbidities, high-risk additional chromosomal abnormalities) that better stratified patients at risk of therapy failure. Our findings highlight the influence of demographic and clinical differences on predictive models and emphasize the need for local or population-specific tools to optimize risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making in CP-CML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.