ArticleCommunications medicine2025
Synergistic H&E and IHC image analysis by AI predicts cancer biomarkers and survival outcomes in colorectal and breast cancer.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence as a Discovery Engine for Routine Molecular Techniques: Extracting Biological Insight from Western Blotting, ELISA, Immunostaining, and Immunoprecipitation.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Review
- Review
- UNICORN: a deep learning model for integrating multi-stain data in histopathology.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Cross-cancer homologous recombination deficiency prediction from whole slide images using transfer learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AI and the digital pathology revolution: clinical applications in cancer diagnosis and assessment.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in ovarian cancer: advancing in precision diagnosis and clinical management.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Uncertainty-aware and causal test-time adaptive foundation model for robust colorectal cancer pathology diagnosis.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Emerging Applications of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent advancements in immunotherapy, particularly pembrolizumab, have shown promising results in treating metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Accurate detection of predictive biomarkers, such as microsatellite instability (MSI)/mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), is key to efficacy of these treatments. Traditional methods like immunohistochemistry (IHC) and next-generation sequencing are effective but are labor intensive and require subjective interpretation.
methodsWe developed a dual-modality transformer-based model for predicting MSI/MMRd and PD-L1 status using hematoxylin & eosin and IHC stained whole slide images. We evaluated the model using area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC). Time-on-treatment (TOT) and overall survival (OS) were derived from insurance claims and analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HR) were determined using the Cox proportional hazard model.
resultsOur AI framework achieves clinical-grade performance, with AUROC exceeding 0.97 for MSI/MMRd prediction in CRC and 0.96 for PD-L1 prediction in breast cancer. Patients with biomarker-positive model predictions demonstrated prolonged TOT and OS when treated with pembrolizumab. For breast cancer patients, the model's predictions were superior to PD-L1 IHC in stratifying patients with improved outcomes on pembrolizumab, suggesting a reevaluation of existing PD-L1 status thresholds.
conclusionsThis study promotes the integration of advanced AI tools in clinical pathology, aiming to enhance the precision and efficiency of cancer biomarker evaluation and offering a customizable framework for varied clinical scenarios. Our model enhances predictive accuracy, integrating features from both staining methods, and exhibits superior prognostic precision compared to current biomarker assessments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.