ArticleCommunications chemistry2025
Reference library for suspect screening of environmental toxicants using ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry.
Article in Communications chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Computational Chemistry and Ion Mobility Spectrometry into Non-Targeted Analysis Workflows for the Structural Elucidation of Emerging PFAS.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2026Article
- ToxBase: A Multidimensional ToxCast Reference Database for High-Throughput Human Exposome Analysis.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- Insights into complementary exposomic targeted analysis and suspect screening approaches: a case study examining human serum for chemicals with LC-IMS-MS.Environmental science. Advances · 2026Article
- Review
- An in vitro-in silico workflow for predicting renal clearance of environmental chemicals and drugs.Toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to the potential health risks related to chemical exposure, rapidly assessing xenobiotic molecules in the environment and those already in the body is imperative. Targeted analytical methods coupling either gas or liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry (GC-MS or LC-MS) are commonly utilized in current exposure assessments. While these methods are accepted as the gold standard for exposure analyses, they often require multiple sample preparation steps and analysis times > 30 min. These limitations have resulted in an evolving interest in using ion mobility spectrometry and MS (IMS-MS), either with or without chromatography, to improve throughput and annotation confidence. To increase IMS-MS information availability for exposure studies, here we utilized drift tube IMS-MS to evaluate 4685 xenobiotic chemical standards from the Environmental Protection Agency Toxicity Forecaster (ToxCast) programme, including pesticides, industrial chemicals, pharmaceuticals, consumer products, and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances. Collision cross section (CCS) and m/z values were detected for 2144 unique chemicals with high confidence and reproducibility (≤1% error intra-laboratory and ≤2% inter-laboratory), resulting in values for 4004 [M + H]
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.