Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40750668›Full record

ArticleCommunications chemistry2025

Reference library for suspect screening of environmental toxicants using ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry.

Devin Teri, Noor A Aly, James N Dodds, Jian Zhang, Paul A Thiessen, Evan E Bolton, Kara M Joseph, Antony J Williams, Emma L Schymanski, Ivan Rusyn and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Devin TeriDepartment of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Noor A AlyDepartment of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
James N DoddsDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9702-2294
Jian ZhangNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Paul A ThiessenNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1992-2086
Evan E BoltonNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Kara M JosephDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Antony J WilliamsCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2668-4821
Emma L SchymanskiLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, Belvaux, Luxembourg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6868-8145
Ivan RusynDepartment of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. irusyn@tamu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9340-7384
Erin S BakerDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. erinmsb@unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5246-2213

Funding

Single cell, multi-parametric high throughput platform to classify endocrine disruptor potential of mixturesP42ES027704 · NIEHS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI Efstratios Pistikopoulos · 2017 to 2026
$21.2M
Regulatory Science in Environmental Health and ToxicologyT32ES026568 · NIEHS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI Weihsueh A Chiu, Natalie M Johnson · 2016 to 2026
$3.8M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES027704NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES026568U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US Environmental Protection Agency) STAR RD 84003201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the potential health risks related to chemical exposure, rapidly assessing xenobiotic molecules in the environment and those already in the body is imperative. Targeted analytical methods coupling either gas or liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry (GC-MS or LC-MS) are commonly utilized in current exposure assessments. While these methods are accepted as the gold standard for exposure analyses, they often require multiple sample preparation steps and analysis times > 30 min. These limitations have resulted in an evolving interest in using ion mobility spectrometry and MS (IMS-MS), either with or without chromatography, to improve throughput and annotation confidence. To increase IMS-MS information availability for exposure studies, here we utilized drift tube IMS-MS to evaluate 4685 xenobiotic chemical standards from the Environmental Protection Agency Toxicity Forecaster (ToxCast) programme, including pesticides, industrial chemicals, pharmaceuticals, consumer products, and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances. Collision cross section (CCS) and m/z values were detected for 2144 unique chemicals with high confidence and reproducibility (≤1% error intra-laboratory and ≤2% inter-laboratory), resulting in values for 4004 [M + H]

Identifiers

PMID40750668
PMCPMC12317010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.