ArticleScientific reports2025
Validated thermal model for bacterial survival in fire-resistant self-healing concrete.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bacteria-based self-healing concrete offers a sustainable solution to extend the service life of infrastructure by autonomously sealing cracks through microbial calcium carbonate precipitation. However, under fire conditions, the survival of encapsulated bacteria remains uncertain due to extreme temperatures that compromise biological activity and structural integrity. This study introduces a validated heat transfer model to estimate how long encapsulated bacteria can survive during fire exposure following ISO 834 conditions. The model incorporates radial heat diffusion, thermal properties of multi-layer encapsulation, and bacterial inactivation thresholds. Experimental data from our earlier study, including additional unpublished experimental insights, are used to validate the model across temperatures ranging from 200 °C to 800 °C. Simulations showed that carbon fiber-cement paste encapsulation can slow heat entry and help bacteria survive for nearly 20 h at 200 °C and about 4 h at 800 °C. In contrast, gelatin-based encapsulations degraded rapidly and failed to protect bacteria beyond 200 °C. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that encapsulation thickness critically influences survival, with layers ≥ 1.75 mm providing significantly longer protection. This modelling framework, validated using prior experimental results on bacterial viability under fire exposure, provides a predictive basis for evaluating microbial survival in self-healing concrete systems employing multilayer encapsulation. The findings provide practical insights into optimizing encapsulation strategies to preserve bacterial functionality and enable post-fire self-healing in concrete structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.