ArticleScientific reports2025
Computational screening identifies selective aldose reductase inhibitors with strong efficacy and limited off target interactions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selective Anti-Giardial Action of Indirubin: Biochemical and Functional Evidence for Inhibition of Triosephosphate Isomerase and Aldose Reductase inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Unraveling the Antihyperglycemic Effects of Dipeptyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors in Rodents: A Multi-Faceted Approach Combining Effects on Glucose Homeostasis, Molecular Docking, and ADMET Profiling.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is characterized by persistent hyperglycemia that triggers micro-vascular complications in organs such as the eyes and kidneys; a pivotal enzymatic driver is aldose reductase (AR), which reduces glucose to sorbitol. Because existing AR inhibitors often cause off-target toxicity, we implemented an integrative in-silico workflow to discover selective, safer compounds. A library of 4 975 small molecules was docked against AR and, in parallel, against five clinically relevant antitarget proteins or proteins whose unintended inhibition is associated with adverse pharmacological or toxicological effects (CYP2A6, CYP2C9, CYP3A4, SULT1A3 and the pregnane X receptor), retaining 236 ligands whose binding energies to every antitarget were weaker than those of the reference drug tolrestat. These survivors were redocked to five high-resolution human AR crystal structures, and the ten best-scoring ligands underwent 100 ns molecular-dynamics simulations followed by MM-PBSA free-energy calculations to refine affinity estimates and probe complex stability. Ligand 4934, a benzo[a]anthracene-pyrene polyphenol, displayed the strongest predicted affinity for while showing poor affinity for the antitarget panel, outperforming tolrestat by more than 2 kcal mol⁻¹ and adopting a stable plug-like pose that occludes the catalytic pocket through extensive π-π and hydrophobic contacts with Trp111, Phe123 and Lys22. These findings highlight ligand 4934 as a promising scaffold for selective AR inhibition and demonstrate the effectiveness of the stepwise computational strategy in prioritizing lead compounds with reduced off-target liabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.