Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40750635›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Advanced hybrid intelligence evaluation of nanomedicine delivery to various organs using machine learning and adaptive tree structured Parzen estimator.

Wael A Mahdi, Adel Alhowyan, Ahmad J Obaidullah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wael A MahdiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2457, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia. wmahdi@ksu.edu.sa.
Adel AlhowyanDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2457, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia. adel-ali@ksu.edu.sa.
Ahmad J ObaidullahDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2457, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

King Saud University ORF-2025-516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have examined the efficiency of drug delivery for targeted therapy by theoretical models. Machine learning strategy was tested to analyze the drug delivery of nanomedicines to the desired sites for efficient treatment. The inputs to the models are properties of nanoparticles, tumor model, cancer type, administration dose of drug, while the outputs are delivery efficiency of drug in various organs. The ML models employed include Elastic Net Regression (EN), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Polynomial Regression (PR), and an ensemble method using Boosting to leverage the strengths of these individual models. The dataset includes both categorical and numerical variables related to nanoparticle properties and their distribution across organs like the tumor, spleen, heart, liver, lung, and kidney. Hyperparameter optimization was enhanced using the Adaptive Tree-Structured Parzen Estimator (ATPE), which improves upon traditional Bayesian optimization methods. The results demonstrated that the AdaBoost KNN model consistently outperformed other models in predicting nanoparticle biodistribution, with high R² values and low RMSE across multiple organ targets, thus proving effective in capturing complex input-output relationships. This approach offers a robust framework for advancing predictive modeling in biomedical applications involving nanoparticles.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsMachine LearningNanomedicineBayes TheoremHumansNanoparticlesTissue DistributionDrug delivery efficiencyMachine learningPharmaceuticsPolynomial regression

Identifiers

PMID40750635
PMCPMC12316898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.