ArticleScientific reports2025
Advanced hybrid intelligence evaluation of nanomedicine delivery to various organs using machine learning and adaptive tree structured Parzen estimator.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer-Associated Fibroblast-Targeted Nanomedicine in Solid Tumor Therapy: From Mechanisms of Therapeutic Resistance to Precision Stromal Modulation.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- AI-enabled photoresponsive nanoplatforms for coordinated osteosarcoma therapy and bone regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Machine learning framework for predicting susceptibility to obesity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We have examined the efficiency of drug delivery for targeted therapy by theoretical models. Machine learning strategy was tested to analyze the drug delivery of nanomedicines to the desired sites for efficient treatment. The inputs to the models are properties of nanoparticles, tumor model, cancer type, administration dose of drug, while the outputs are delivery efficiency of drug in various organs. The ML models employed include Elastic Net Regression (EN), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Polynomial Regression (PR), and an ensemble method using Boosting to leverage the strengths of these individual models. The dataset includes both categorical and numerical variables related to nanoparticle properties and their distribution across organs like the tumor, spleen, heart, liver, lung, and kidney. Hyperparameter optimization was enhanced using the Adaptive Tree-Structured Parzen Estimator (ATPE), which improves upon traditional Bayesian optimization methods. The results demonstrated that the AdaBoost KNN model consistently outperformed other models in predicting nanoparticle biodistribution, with high R² values and low RMSE across multiple organ targets, thus proving effective in capturing complex input-output relationships. This approach offers a robust framework for advancing predictive modeling in biomedical applications involving nanoparticles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.