ArticleScientific reports2025
Adaptive clustering for medical image analysis using the improved separation index.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clustering high-dimensional biomedical data without prior knowledge of the number of clusters remains a major challenge in medical image and signal analysis. We present SONSC (Separation-Optimized Number of Smart Clusters), an adaptive and interpretable clustering framework driven by the Improved Separation Index (ISI)-a novel internal validity metric that jointly evaluates intra-cluster compactness and inter-cluster separability. SONSC iteratively maximizes ISI across candidate cluster configurations to automatically infer the optimal number of clusters, without supervision or parameter tuning. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets (MNIST, CIFAR-10) and real-world clinical modalities (chest X-ray, ECG, RNA-seq) demonstrate that SONSC consistently outperforms classical methods such as K-Means, DBSCAN, and spectral clustering in ISI, Silhouette score, and normalized mutual information (NMI). Beyond numerical performance, SONSC identifies clinically coherent structures aligned with expert-labeled categories, supporting its integration into diagnostic and patient stratification pipelines. By unifying algorithmic robustness with medical interpretability, SONSC provides a scalable and trustworthy solution for unsupervised biomedical data analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.