Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40750628›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Classification of diaphyseal tumors based on residual medullary cavity length for prosthetic reconstruction.

Leming Mou, Miao Zhang, Hongyu Wang, Jingyu Zhang, Dongmu Tian, Yongcheng Hu, Dengxing Lun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leming MouWeiFang People's Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, China.
Miao ZhangDepartment of Joint Surgery, WeiFang People's Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, China.
Hongyu WangWeiFang People's Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, China.
Jingyu ZhangBone Tumor and Soft Tissue Oncology, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Dongmu TianShandong Weigao Orthopaedic Device Co.,Ltd, Weihai, Shandong Province, China.
Yongcheng HuBone Tumor and Soft Tissue Oncology, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Dengxing LunWeiFang People's Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, China. lundengxing@163.com.

Funding

Weifang Health Commission Research Project WFWSJK-2022-045Weifang Municipal Health Commission Chinese Medicine Research Project WFZYY2024-1-009Weifang Science and Technology Development Programme Project 2024YX012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diaphyseal prosthetic reconstruction for bone tumors continues to face challenges with failures due to the lack of evidence-based classification systems. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel classification framework to optimize reconstruction strategies through a retrospective analysis of 112 patients undergoing diaphyseal prosthetic reconstruction between 2010-2021. Diaphyseal tumors were classified into five types according to anatomical location and residual medullary cavity length, with each category corresponding to a tailored prosthetic reconstruction strategy. Clinical outcomes demonstrated a mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score of 24.3 ± 3.3 with comparable functional outcomes across classification types. The overall complication rate was 16.1% (18/112), primarily involving aseptic loosening (ASL, 8%) and structural failures (3.6%), with a reoperation rate of 6.3% (7/112). Notably, Type I reconstructions using standard stems without plates showed the highest complication rate (21%), while Type IIIa reconstructions exhibited no complications. Competing risk model analysis showed that cumulative mortality rates at 0.5, 1, 3, 5, and 8 years were 6.4%, 17.4%, 54.4%, 59.1%, and 66.5%, respectively, while cumulative complication rates were 2.7%, 6.5%, 12.5%, 19.4%, and 22.5%, respectively. These findings establish diaphyseal prostheses as effective solutions for intercalary defect reconstruction, emphasizing their role in facilitating early weight-bearing and functional recovery. The novel classification system for diaphyseal tumors provides valuable guidance for the design and application of prosthetic reconstructions.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsDiaphysesPlastic Surgery ProceduresAdolescentAdultAgedChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultClassificationDiaphyseal prosthesesDiaphyseal tumorsSurgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID40750628
PMCPMC12317058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.