ArticleScientific reports2025
Self compacting concrete with recycled aggregate compressive strength prediction based on gradient boosting regression tree with Bayesian optimization hybrid model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing the mechanical performance of sustainable industrial waste modified concrete using supervised machine learning modeling and feature importance analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrated use of finite element analysis and gaussian process regression in the structural analysis of AISI 316 stainless steel chimney systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-compacting concrete (SCC) is a special type of concrete that is used in applications requiring high workability, such as in densely reinforced or complex formwork situations. The estimation of 28-day compressive strength for this type is usually made by costly and time-consuming laboratory tests. The problem becomes even more complex when recycled aggregates are added to the mixture to promote eco-friendly and sustainable construction practices. In our research we presented a new hybrid model, GBRT, that was integrated with Bayesian Optimization. This model is able to accurately and efficiently estimate the compressive strength of SCC containing recycled aggregates. We evaluated the model using well-known performance metrics such as RMSE, MAE, and [Formula: see text]. The performance of the model gave us, on average, an RMSE of 6.000, MAE of 3.968, and [Formula: see text] of 0.806 in five-fold cross-validation, which emphasized its strong predictive capability and potential as a cost-effective alternative to conventional laboratory testing. The model was also compared with single learner models such as SVR and KNN in order to demonstrate the superiority of the hybrid approach in terms of prediction accuracy and robustness. Our hybrid model surpassed the two previously mentioned models when testing their performance on the test data. Since our model works as a black-box model, a novel explaining machine learning technique named SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) was employed to determine which predictors have the most importance and how they trend. The developed model is an accurate, fast, and economical substitute for predicting 28-day compressive strength of self-compacting concrete with recycled aggregates. Finally, the model is converted into an easy-to-use graphical interface that provides civil engineers and practitioners with a useful decision-support tool for mix design optimization and quality control in real-life construction projects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.