ArticleNPJ breast cancer2025
Selection biases in the systematic collection of breast biobank specimens.
Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A breast biopsy tissue biobank is a valuable resource for studying breast cancer biology and treatment response. However, underrepresentation of certain patient populations in biobanks limits the generalizability of findings. We assessed potential disparities in the recruitment process for an institutional breast biopsy tissue bank. Ultrasound-guided (USG) research biopsy cores were collected immediately after routine clinical biopsy from January 2019 to October 2022 at a large academic center. Eligible patients (age > 18, with a mass > 0.5 cm), identified by a research associate on the day of the biopsy, were invited to participate at the discretion of the radiologist performing the biopsy. Those approached either consented or declined a research biopsy. 2449 patients underwent USG breast biopsy and 1309 were deemed eligible for a research biopsy. Of the eligible population, 886 (67.7%) were approached for participation, and 423 (32.3%) were not. Of those approached, 564 (63.7%) consented for a research biopsy, while 322 (36.3%) declined. Patients older than 70 years of age and patients who both used a primary language other than English and had non-commercial health insurance were less likely to be approached for biobank participation (p = 0.01 and p = 0.002, respectively). Among those approached, non-Hispanic White patients were more likely to provide their consent compared to patients from other racial and ethnic groups (p = 0.014). Among these groups, non-Hispanic Black patients were particularly less likely to consent to a research biopsy (p = 0.005). Our findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to increase participation across diverse patient subgroups.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.