ArticleTranslational psychiatry2025
Machine learning in psychiatric health records: A gold standard approach to trauma annotation.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Redesigning Mental Health Care: Core Principles for Integrating Systems, Technology and Clinical Workflows.Current psychiatry reports · 2026Review
- Large Language Models Using Clinical Text in Pediatrics: A Scoping Review.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease exacerbates hematoma expansion in intracerebral hemorrhage: an explainable machine learning approach.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Psychiatric electronic health records present unique challenges for machine learning due to their unstructured, complex, and variable nature. This study aimed to create a gold standard dataset by identifying a cohort of patients with psychotic disorders and posttraumatic stress disorder, (PTSD), developing clinically-informed guidelines for annotating traumatic events in their health records and to create a gold standard publicly available dataset, and demonstrating the dataset's suitability for training machine learning models to detect indicators of symptoms, substance use, and trauma in new records. We compiled a representative corpus of 200 narrative heavy health records (470,489 tokens) from a centralized database and developed a detailed annotation scheme with a team of clinical experts and computational linguistics. Clinicians annotated the corpus for trauma-related events and relevant clinical information with high inter-annotator agreement (0.715 for entity/span tags and 0.874 for attributes). Additionally, machine learning models were developed to demonstrate practical viability of the gold standard corpus for machine learning applications, achieving a micro F1 score of 0.76 and 0.82 for spans and attributes respectively, indicative of their predictive reliability. This study established the first gold-standard dataset for the complex task of labelling traumatic features in psychiatric health records. High inter-annotator agreement and model performance illustrate its utility in advancing the application of machine learning in psychiatric healthcare in order to better understand disease heterogeneity and treatment implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.