Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40750350›Full record

ArticleHealth economics2025

Insurer Size and Negotiated Hospital Prices: Insights From the Affordable Care Act in Arkansas.

Jee-Hun Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jee-Hun ChoiEconomics Department, College of Business, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0824-5742

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines the role of insurer size in price negotiations between commercial health insurers and hospitals in the United States. The empirical analysis focuses on a dominant insurer in the Arkansas individual health insurance market that experienced a size increase due to a policy change. Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), Arkansas expanded its Medicaid program, but unlike other expansion states, it used individual plans-a private insurance option generally not designed for Medicaid-to provide coverage to newly insured beneficiaries. This unique policy nearly doubled the insurer's individual plan enrollment after the ACA was implemented. Admission-level regression analysis reveals that the insurer's hospital inpatient prices for individual plans decreased by 16.7% following the expansion. Consistent with the predictions from bargaining models, the findings suggest that the insurer's increased bargaining leverage due to its larger size is the primary mechanism behind the price reduction.

Indexed as

Insurance CarriersInsurance, HealthNegotiatingPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActArkansasHumansInsurance CoverageMedicaidUnited Statesaffordable care actbuyer size effectinsurer–hospital negotiationmedicaid expansionprice negotiation

Identifiers

PMID40750350
PMCPMC12496023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.