ArticleBJGP open2026
Utilisation of a GP-staffed emergency response unit: an observational study from Norway.
Article in BJGP open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmergency department (ED) crowding is a growing challenge, highlighting the need for safe and effective prehospital alternatives to hospital conveyance.
aimTo investigate how a GP-staffed emergency primary care response unit (EPCRU) affects resource allocation and patient pathways. DESIGN &
settingA prospective observational study conducted in two Norwegian municipalities served by a GP-staffed EPCRU.
methodAll call-outs (
resultsMost call-outs were categorised as acute (57.6%) by the call centre and comprised a broad spectrum of conditions and severities. The EPCRU was first on scene in 44.1% of cases. In total, 44.1% of patients were treated on site without hospital conveyance. A mismatch was observed between telephone and on-site triage: 34.2% of acute cases were reassigned to yellow (the midpoint of a 5-point urgency scale) by the Rapid Emergency Triage and Treatment System (RETTS) on-site triage. The EPCRU altered expected care trajectories compared with standard ambulance response by enabling both non-conveyance and direct ED admissions.
conclusionA GP-staffed response unit may enhance resource efficiency, patient flow, and timely care, which offers potential benefits for emergency systems facing growing demand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.