ArticleBMJ open2025
Towards novel BIOmarkers to diagnose SEPsis (BIOSEP) in the emergency room: a protocol for a multicentre, prospective cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06178822 (Towards Novel BIOmarkers to Diagnose SEPsis on the Emergency Room), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Towards Novel BIOmarkers to Diagnose SEPsis on the Emergency Room
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interobserver Agreement for Classifying Infections in Emergency Department Patients Using Modified Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Criteria.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of PCT, IL-6, and MR-ProADM for early identification of sepsis in the emergency department.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe international Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines highlight the need for recognising sepsis in a timely and accurate manner. Early diagnosis and treatment of sepsis are crucial and associated with reduced mortality. In the early stages of sepsis, heterogeneous clinical signs are difficult to interpret, often leading to missed or delayed diagnoses, as well as inappropriate or late use of antibiotics. There is an urgent need to quickly and accurately identify patients with potential infection in the emergency department (ED) who are at risk of progressing along the infection-sepsis spectrum. This study aims to compare the immune responses of ED patients presenting with a (suspected) infection, both with and without sepsis, to gain insights into immune aberrations and identify novel biomarkers linked to an increased risk of developing sepsis and its sequelae. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective observational cohort study across three hospitals in the Netherlands will be conducted. Adults presenting to the ED of these hospitals, with a (suspected) infection and a Modified Early Warning Score of 2 or higher, will be eligible for enrolment. We aim to include up to 3330 patients. The main study parameters will be characterisation of the host immune and metabolic response using multiomics analysis, Raman spectroscopy, mass spectrometry and gut microbiota profiling in relation to clinical outcomes such as 30-day mortality, length of hospital stay, readmission and postsepsis sequelae. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Verbal and written informed consent will be obtained from all participants or their legal representatives. The study was approved by the Amsterdam University Medical Centre Ethics Committee (No. 2022.0279) and will adhere to the Declaration of Helsinki and the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO). Research results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06178822.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.