ArticleBMJ open2025
Effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: study protocol for a single-centre, prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Swallowing Function in Post-stroke Dysphagia: A Randomized Controlled Study.Translational stroke research · 2026Trial
- Comparative analysis on the effect of vagus nerve stimulation in reducing post-operative inflammation and enhancing recovery outcomes after surgery.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is different from open cholecystectomy, characterised by visceral pain, parietal pain and shoulder pain, which affects postoperative recovery in patients undergoing LC. Recent studies have demonstrated the clinical efficacy of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) in both acute and chronic pain treatment. The objective of this study protocol is to investigate the efficacy of taVNS in alleviating postoperative pain following LC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this single-centre, prospective, randomised, double-blind and controlled study, we will enrol 88 participants, aged between 18 and 65 years, who are scheduled for elective LC, and they will be randomly assigned to either the taVNS group (group T) or the control group (group C). For the primary outcome, we will compare the difference in pain score 6 hours after LC assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale. For the secondary outcomes, we will compare the difference including Quality of Recovery-15, Self-rating Depression Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting score. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Ethics Committee of Huzhou Central Hospital granted approval for the study with approval number: 202301007-01. Dissemination will be via national anaesthesia conferences and publication in the peer-reviewed literature. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300068410.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.