ArticleJACC. Case reports2025
Recurrent Ventricular Fibrillation Due to Coronary Vasospasm Without Preceding ST-Segment Elevation or Chest Pain.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoronary vasospasm (CV) is a rare cause of malignant ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac arrest. It typically presents with chest pain and marked ST-segment elevation. CASE SUMMARY: We present the case of a 61-year-old man with recurrent malignant ventricular arrhythmia and implantable defibrillator shocks without preceding chest pain. The diagnosis of CV remained elusive for 3 months despite extensive investigation. Close inspection of telemetry revealed progressive ST-segment depression and T-wave inversion before arrest. Coronary angiography with low-dose acetylcholine testing revealed multivessel vasospasm. Vasodilator therapy was initiated with rapid elimination of ventricular arrhythmia. DISCUSSION: This case highlights that cardiac arrest due to CV may present without the classical features of chest pain or ST-segment elevation, underscoring the value of provocation testing in unexplained arrhythmia. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: CV may present without preceding angina or ST-segment elevation. Careful electrocardiogram review and early provocation testing can identify vasospasm and guide therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.