Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40750096›Full record

ArticleJMIR serious games2025

Children's Improvement After Language and Rhythm Training With the Digital Medical Device Poppins for Dyslexia: Single-Arm Intervention Study.

Charline Grossard, Melanie Descamps, Hugues Pellerin, François Vonthron, David Cohen

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR serious games, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06596980 (Single Arm Study Assessing the Effect of the Digital Medical Device Poppins Clinical for Cognitive and Musical Training in Pediatric Participants With a Specific Learning Disability With Deficits in Reading), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06596980 nacompletednot on this map

Single Arm Study Assessing the Effect of the Digital Medical Device Poppins Clinical for Cognitive and Musical Training in Pediatric Participants With a Specific Learning Disability With Deficits in Reading

TypeinterventionalSponsorPoppinsRan2024 to 2025Enrolled38ConditionsLearning Disorders, Specific, Learning Disabilities, Specific Learning Disorder, With Impairment in Reading, DyslexiaArmsPoppins Clinical
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Charline GrossardDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4850-828X
Melanie DescampsPoppins, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6439-3833
Hugues PellerinDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4974-9917
François VonthronPoppins, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9680-3371
David CohenDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3321-7375

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpecific learning disorder in reading (SLD reading), commonly named dyslexia, is a neurodevelopmental condition affecting reading. Current best practice recommendations for SLD reading emphasize the necessity of including graphophonological interventions. The serious game Mila-Learn, which is based on rhythm training, showed promising results in a prior randomized trial. However, it lacked a component of graphophonological training.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Poppins, a new digital medical device that combines rhythm-based and graphophonological training for improving reading and phonological skills in children with SLD reading. We also explored its performance against Mila-Learn, the earlier version based on rhythm training only.

methodsA single-arm study without an active control group was conducted with 38 children (aged 7-11 years) diagnosed with SLD reading. The participants completed an 8-week training program with Poppins (five 20-minute sessions per week). Pre- and posttraining assessments measured reading accuracy and speed, phoneme deletion, and phonological discrimination. Statistical analysis included pre- and postcomparisons (primary analysis) and comparisons with children's improvement from a previous randomized controlled trial of Mila-Learn, an earlier version of the device (exploratory analysis).

resultsThe participants demonstrated significant improvements in reading accuracy (+11.46 words correctly read; P<.001), reading speed (+10.26 words read; P<.001), and phoneme deletion (+2.87 points; P<.001). No significant change was observed in reading comprehension for younger participants (grades 2-3; P=.09), although improvements were noted in older children (grades 4-5, P=.03). Exploratory analysis comparing children's improvements with Mila-Learn and Poppins revealed similar gains in reading accuracy and speed but revealed superior improvement in phonological skills for the Poppins group, with a moderate effect size according to the benchmarks by Cohen (Cohen d=0.48, P=.02).

conclusionsPoppins is an effective and safe tool for enhancing reading and phonological skills in children with SLD reading. By integrating rhythm-based and graphophonological exercises, the device aligns with best practice recommendations for curative intervention. Future research should explore its long-term effects and medicoeconomic impact and compare outcomes with those of conventional therapy, as serious games provide an engaging, scalable method for delivering such interventions.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06596980; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06596980.

Indexed as

medical devicereadingrhythmserious gamespecific learning disorder

Identifiers

PMID40750096
PMCPMC12357122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.